Since my blog has moved, I can no longer use Bloggers "Follower" gadget. If you are a part of NetWorked blogs, which includes a Facebook page, you can follow through NetworkedBlogs, and I can follow you back. Please come to my new blog - MaggiesNotebook.com, see the NetworkedBlogs widget in the right sidebar and click follow. I will follow back.
"I learned that in extreme situations when human lives and dignity are at state, neutrality is a sin. It helps the killers, not the victims." Elie Wiesel, Holocaust Survivor who lost his family in the Holocaust - Nobel Prize Author
Socialism - Liberalism Quotation
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened." – Norman Thomas
The long shadow of the Obama administration taints much that is near sacred in the U.S., including election laws. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has ruled in favor of SEIU's (Service Employees International Union) demand that local unions MUST send $25,000 to the SEIU Political PAC, or be fined $37,500. This is a clear violation of FEC law. The video below tells the story.
Obama Taints the White House
Had enough? I certainly have. We have a creeping lawlessness in America and it isn't roaming the streets of the Nation, it's lurking in the hallways of the White House, the Justice Department, Congress and all the president's cabinet offices.
As it happens, the Federal Election Commission expressly forbids organizations from fining members for not contributing to political action committees (PACs). Because of this proscription, the folks at NRTW [National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation] filed a complaint with the FEC about the SEIU’s practice.
Fox News states the FEC's own general counsel found that SEIU violated election law - YET, the FEC quietly voted to overrule their own attorney, and allow the mammoth organization to march toward a $9 million war chest (...and if you have a loved one in a nursing home, an SEIU worker is likely caring for them). Pay attention to the following. I believe this statement was not made lightly:
"To us it was a prima facie case for coercion," Mix said [NRTW]. "Plus, it looked like a money laundering scheme as well, because locals would pay the penalties from their general funds into the political action committee. General union treasury funds are not allowed to be used for political purposes," he said.
Warner Todd Huston, the prolific conservative writer published on so many fine websites, is trying to revive our interest in Net Neutrality. It is not always easy to find credible and understandable sources for a topic like Net Neutrality, so Huston has offered some of his sources, which I will link on each of my blogs on the subject. I will be talking about Net Neutrality regularly because this is a dark looming threat to our freedom of speech and freedom of press. See two videos below.
Net Neutrality
The place to get started is a video with Adam Thierer concisely introducing what Net Neutrality advocates hope to regulate and/or steal from us, and how dangerous the movement is. This from Huston:
Adam Thierer is one of the sharpest folks working to inform the nation about how bad Net Neutrality is for our nation. One of his best pieces is The 5-Part Case against Net Neutrality Regulation. He shows that the oppressive regulations that the left-leaning Net Neutrality supporters want will stifle innovation and invention right as the age of the Internet is just lifting off.
Michael Copps the FCC Commissioner is currently onboard for Net Neutrality. In January 2007, FCC Copps unveiled a new American Media Contract 2007 at a gathering of the National Media Reform Conference in Memphis. In the audience that day was Jane Fonda, Danny Glover, Geena Davis, Senator Bernie Sanders, Bill Moyers, Helen Thomas and Jessie Jackson. Does that get your attention?
In the "Contract," Copps gives us a good look at his goals and ambitions, and there is nothing decent in them. Here are portions of the Contract:
We expect these:
1) A right to media that strengthens our democracy
2) A right to local stations that are actually local
3) A right to media that looks and sounds like America
4) A right to news that isn't canned and radio playlists that aren't for sale
5) A right to programming that isn't so damned bad, so damned often
At the time, I asked who decides what America "looks" and "sounds like?" Who decides if the news is "canned" or not?" Who decides what "strengthens our democracy?"
Michael Copps further asked:
"And what do the American people -- who own the public airwaves, by the way -- get in return? Too little news, too much baloney passed off as news. Too little quality entertainment, too many people eating bugs on reality TV. Too little local and regional music, too much brain-numbing national play-lists. Too little of America, too much of Wall Street and Madison Avenue...."
Too much "baloney passed off as news?"
Flash forward to today, and Michael Copps has Net Neutrality on his mind. From Media Freedom:
How many times can FCC Commissioner Michael Copps declare the Internet dead? Like a fire-and-brimstone preacher bombastically bellowing sermons warning of the impending End Times, Commissioner Copps has made a hobby out of declaring the Internet dead and buried unless drastic steps are taken right now to save cyberspace! The problem is, he’s being saying this for the past decade and yet, despite generally laissez-faire policy in this arena, the Internet is still very much alive and well.
His biggest beef, of course, is Net Neutrality regulation—or the current lack thereof. He fears that without such a “Mother, May I” regulatory regime in place, the whole cyber-world is heading for eternal damnation. Echoing the fears of other Internet hyper-pessimists, Copps concocts grand conspiracy stories of nefarious corporate schemers hell-bent on quashing our digital liberties and foreclosing all Internet freedom.
Regulating Controlling our internet and radio through Net Neutrality and a so-called Fairness Doctrine go hand-in-hand. Obama appointed D.C. attorney Henry Rivera to guide his FCC transition team. Rivera, in-step with the Obama administration, believe "communications" is a "civil rights issue." Not to stray too far off the subject, it is good to note within the topic of Net Neutrality, the administration's goal to give broadcasting licenses to ethnic minorities. These are Rivera's goals:
1) funnel more "federal advertising" to minority media
2) allow foreign ownership; relax U.S. trade barriers to provide "overseas capital," for minority broadcasters
3) develop "constitutionally permissible yet non-dilute method of defining" the class [race] of licensees, i.e., "an applicant's race would be one of the numerous factors considered when the Commission reviews a license application."
4) change the FCC Commission to a more diverse Commission - it should look like America
Free press, free speech, the Internet, radio and television is under assault, and is all apart of one fabric. Net Neturality is on the front burner. I hope you will listen to Thierer in the videos below as he explains exactly what we are facing.
Anita Moncreif is a former ACORN worker, turned whistle-blower. She is filing a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) against the Obama campaign and their work with ACORN. She is also releasing the campaign's second quarter donor list, which, according to Moncreif, Obama refused to release. He gave the list to ACORN, who then reportedly used it to raise money. Obama says it is not his list and has denied the list to the New York Times, who refused to run the story. See the video below, filmed at the Las Vegas Right OnLine convention. Anita's new website: Emerging Corruption
FAIR USE: This blog may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner or may be authorized or licensed for publication at this site only. Permission to copy, republish or reproduce such material must be obtained from the original copyright owner.
Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Important Notice
Patrons of this Blog are advised that they will be held responsible for any unlawful, harassing, libelous, abusive, threatening, or harmful material of any kind or nature posted by their respective ISP. Patrons are cautioned not to transmit via comments, including links to any material that encourages conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, national or international law or regulation. Comments here are typically unmoderated and unedited. The fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes the site owner's endorsement of commenters' views.