Quantcast

Pages

Showing posts with label Charity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charity. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Prince Charles Uses Charity for Collateral - Not a Good Move Video


The Prince of Wales, or Charles as some of us know him (you know him as "Charles," right?) tried to save an historic home in Britain. I love the shots of the house and furniture and thought you might enjoy them too. Apparently Charles took out a 20 million pound loan ($30.8 million), collateralized by his "charitable foundation." To pay the loan back, they purchased a field near the home with plans to sell it to a developer. The problem is, the market in Britain has not done well, and the land seems to be worth only about 8 million pounds, not nearly enough to satisfy the loan. See the video.


How the Prince of Wales saved Dumfries House in Ayrshire for the nation, 
but what was dubbed the ‘heritage save of the century’ became more like an own goal

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Gustus Bozarth is Flag Rescuer: Homeless Man Gustus Bozarth Rescues Flag

A El Paso security camera caught Gustus Bozarth rescuing the American flag, which had fallen in a storm. The videotape showed Mr. Bozarth in a driving rain, carefully folding the flag military-style, on the hood of a pick-up truck, and then leaving it and the pole in a safe place on the property. Across the country, people are responding to his plight and offering help. See the video below.

Gustus Bozarth

The owner of the flag is METI Inc., a federal contracting company. According to their spokesperson, METI has had a "heart warming" response to the story, with offers to help with donations. KFOX is also working with an agency to provide aid. 

METI employees were shocked to find the downed-flag not strewn on the ground in front of their building, but neatly and properly folded. That's when they checked the security tape showing Gustus Bozarth at 1:40 a.m. folding the flag in a driving rainstorm.

KFOX14 quotes Bozarth:
It's a small respect, folding the flag like that," he said. Bozarth said he learned to fold the flag when he worked as a security officer in Tampa, FL.
WoundedTimes says Gustus lives in the back of a warehouse just feet from where the fallen flag was found.

METI Inc. at first refused to take donations for Gustus until they could a arrange a way to keep the funds safe. According to the video below, a fund has now been set-up. For details contact METI Inc. at 915-772-4975 or KFOX14 at 915-833-8585.




Megyn Kelly has the story of Gustus Bozarth (center)

Linked by Chicago Ray's Conservative Chronicles - Thanks Ray!

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Haiti: Food Healthcare Aid Must Stop: Haiti has the $14 Billion it Needs to Rebuild

The Haitian economy is in tatters, but not for the reasons you might think. Yes, there was all-time-record-breaking devastation from an earthquake in Haiti's capital of Port au Prince and surrounding areas, but the problem now is foreign food and health aid. As I type, donated food is being stashed in warehouses for a future disaster. And then, there is also a problem with the United Nations (UN) and their money, and their spending, and their excesses.

Haiti Refugees

Let's take the U.N. first. Their budget for Haiti of $732.4 million has seen two-thirds of it going for "salaries, perks and upkeep of its own personnel, not the residents of the devastated island:
The world organization plans to spend the money on an expanded force of some 12,675 soldiers and police, plus some 479 international staffers, 669 international contract personnel, and 1,300 local workers, just for the 12 months ending June 30, 2010.
As the world out-pouring of donations hits the Haitian soil, the price of food sold by the people is lowered, and the result is that people can't trade or sell their goods.
If food is free local farmers can't sell what they grow.
 Desperately poor residents who aren't earthquake victims are moving into refugee camps for the free food and health care. But the government wants residents to be less dependent on foreign aid, not more.
Now, here is the story:
Even as many go without meals, relief food that's already made it to Haiti is now being sent to warehouses for future disasters. USAID calls it "prepositioning." The U.N. also says they are scaling back and "repositioning" for future needs.
Yet, the article linked above says "hundreds of thousands go hungry."

Haiti says it still needs monetary donations, but they need it for rebuilding the ravaged areas, not for food.
As of today, total donations to Haiti meet and exceed the biggest estimates of how much it will cost to rebuild -- up to $14 billion. The record-breaking Hope for haiti Telethon in January brought in more than $66 million. That's part of the $4 billion raised by non-government groups and charities. The U.S. Government has given more than $1 billion and has pledged another billion-plus. Other countries and world bodies have pledged $8.75 billion over two years. That's $14.9 billion and counting.
A suggestion: if you continue sending donations to Haiti, don't send them the U.N.

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

American Idol Gives Back to Pro-Abortion Organizations

American Idol's America Gives Back is asking for our donations tonight. The show has sent millions to many organizations do many good things, but this year we learn that some of our money has been given to to pro-abortion charitable organizations in the past, and AI supported a fund-raiser for Planned Parenthood in Los Angeles recently.

Future American Idols?

What are these people thinking? Abortion is such an emotional subject. It concerns life or death - not the life of a salamander that can't cross a highway safely which needs the U.S. government to build passage for it. It's about the life of a baby. Why would American Idol, which has a plethora of grandmothers and very young little girls voting, send money, on behalf of donors, to end a life?

On his second day in office, President Obama rescinded the Mexico City Policy which kept American foreign aid from funding abortion. Obama said it was tops on his list, and he struck it down. Democrats have no shame, and their mission is domination.

So be aware, if you donate tonight, your money may be hijacked. Read more from Jake Jones, the Evangelical Examiner,







Friday, March 12, 2010

Boys and Girls Club of America Closes Clubs but Pays CEO $1M: Roxanne Spillett Paid $1M from Boys and Girls Clubs

The Boys and Girls Clubs of America is closing local clubs for lack of funding but paid the president and CEO, Roxanne Spillett,  nearly $1M in 2008. The groups execs spent $4.3M on travel, $1.6M on conventions and meetings and $544,000 on lobbying. A bill is in the Senate now that, if passed, will funnel $425M in federal funds to the Boys and Girls Club.

Roxanne Spillett

Four Republican senators have asked the organization to provide detailed financial information. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) says the bill will go nowhere until an accounting is made. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) says the organization might be "siphoning off federal dollars that should be going to help kids." Sen. Jon Kyle (R-AZ) and John Cornyn (R-TX) also signed the request for further information.

Remember, when Air America Radio was failing and broke? Remember when they "borrowed" $875,000 from a New York City Boys and Girls Club charter organization. Now-senator, Al Franken (D-MN), eventually signed an agreement to repay the funds, although they tried to tell us that Air America did not borrow the money, the parent organization did. Funny thing, though, Al signed the repayment agreement. Most of us would not want to put our signature on an $875,000 loan unless we had no choice knowing we actually owed the money.

In April 2009, it was announced that four clubs in Washington, D.C. would close; others would be sold and the organization  "coped" with a $7M deficit.
In addition, the region's 22 Boys and Girls Clubs have experienced declines in membership as students abandoned civic organizations in favor of video games, competitive sports, music lessons and other activities.

The changes reflect a movement away from outdated gymnasiums toward more modern clubhouses with state-of-the-art game rooms and computer labs.
The East Side Branch of the Boys and Girls Club in the Tacoma area, will close in June 2010.The South End Club closed almost a year ago. There's a new plan underway to develop HOPE (Home of Opportunity, Possibility and Empowerment) centers. The Boys and Girls Club execs say they can serve more children with HOPE.

In December 2009, the Boys and Girls Club of Columbus, Ohio chose between paying utility bills and paying employees or letting them go. The Columbus community came to the rescue, not the Boys and Girls Club, while the national organization conferenced, convened and met.

After reading around the Internet about Boys and Girls Clubs, their main goal is to give children a place to go after school, but increasingly, more children are staying away, and finding more high-tech places to spend their time and energy.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Evans Muncie Alive after 28 Days Under Haiti Rubble

Evans Muncie, a 28 year old man, was found alive today under the rubble of the Haiti earthquake. See a video below.

 
Evans Muncie
 
Buried for 27-28 days, reports say that the severely emaciated Muncie will recover. He was taken to the American field hospital where he was treated for dehydration, malnutrition and festering wounds on both of his feet. He was found in the rubble of the Croix Bossal market where he worked in Port-au-Prince, and had not been seen since the 7.0 quake hit. Doctors said he was disoriented and at times, thought he was still buried. God bless this young man and those caring for him.


Evans Muncie found alive after 27-28 days in Haiti rubble (video)
 
 
 
Related and Background:
Dr. Richard Bruno found in Haiti Rubble

Stephanie Crispinelli Found in Haiti: Patrick Hartwick Found in Haiti

Christine Gianacaci Body Found in Haiti Rubble at Hotel Montana

Courtney Hayes Body Found in Haiti Rubble

Haiti Lynn University Students Missing Hotel Montana

UMCOR Sam Dixon, Clinton Rabb Dead in Haiti Quake at Hotel Montana

Sweetest Heartbreaking Photos of 2 Year Old Haitian Boy

Haiti Archbishop Joseph Serge Miot, UN's Hedi Annabi Dead in Quake

Haiti Earthquake Video as the Quake Hits - Building Collapses

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Obama Uganda Gays: Bashing Christians- Ignoring Islamic Hate: Obama National Prayer Breakfast Transcript

President Obama and Hillary Clinton both spoke briefly at the National Prayer Breakfast about Ugandan legislation to make homosexuality a crime in Uganda, a crime that could draw the death penalty for "serial offenders." The hidden message is: Christians are behind the Ugandan bill to oppress gays, but he makes no mention of the most torrid gay-haters of all time - Islam. Bash Christians at the National Day of Prayer breakfast, ignore Islamic hate - go figure. See the transcript of Obama's Prayer Breakfast speech below commentary.

Religion in Uganda is divided almost equally between Catholics and Protestants, with 42% each. Twelve percent of the population is Muslim. This Ugandan bill was introduced by David Bahati, who may ties with a controversial Christian group known as The Family. Throughout Islam, homosexuality is punishable by death, although that punishment is not always carried out. Eighty-three countries have laws against homosexuality. Of the 83, 26 are Muslim countries. Seven countries carry the death penalty for "homosexual acts," but...Sharia Law allows the death penalty, at all times.

Obama's message today was subtle. You may have missed it. Leave it to Barack Obama to put the spotlight on Christianity, when it comes to the oppression of gays, but never mentions the heinous crimes against homosexuals by Muslim countries - the only countries where the call for discrimination and, often death, is loud and clear.

Homosexuals die in Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and thoughtout the Muslim world. Has the President ever condemned them? Iran's President Achmadinejad recently said there "are no homosexuals in Iran." Here's why.

If gay communities everywhere were to be a part of the President's comments today, then it was appropriate to bring up Uganda's Anti-Homosexual legislation, specifically because it calls for the death penalty, but why not call out Islam, and it's routine torture, imprisonment, and death of gays. Why not ask our Nation to pray for the safety of homosexuals throughout the world, and from the podium at the National Day of Prayer Breakfast, call out Iran, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia, where the citizens often take over the punishment, saving the government the bother.

In today's speech, more than once, he hinted at Christian intolerance. Who do you think he is talking about with this quote:

For centuries, entire religions have been persecuted, all in the name of perceived righteousness.
Citing the "Golden Rule" and the words of Jesus to 'Love our neighbors as we love ourselves," he quoted an Islamic hadith that cites brotherhood, but ignores that non-believers cannot be brothers with a Muslim. He said there is no religion having a central tenant of hate...but ignores the fact that jihad is called for against any non-believer. He ignores that you and I are non-believers.

Off-topic only a slight bit, but nevertheless relevant, is Obama's failure to call out Palestinian laws that call for the extinction of Jews...the death of Jews. It's no different than the call for death to homosexuals. While demanding a two-state solution in Palestine, with Israel giving up their land in exchange for a peaceful relationship with Palestinians, has Obama, or our State Department, pointed out that Palestinian Constitutions and Charters simply do not allow such a relationship with Israel... or admitted that the "solution" is folly because of the unmitigated hatred from one people toward another people? No he has not.

Other comments in this speech are just as disingenuous. He said our faith requires us not only to believe:
...but to do - to give something of ourselves for the benefit of others and the betterment of our world.
He thinks we do not give, yet the records show that he and Michelle gave next to nothing in years 2000-2004, even though he was an Illinois Senator for three of these year. In 2005 he gave 4% and in 2006 6.7% of his adjusted gross income - as he eyed the presidential campaign trail for 2007. See The TaxProf Blog for how uncharitable this power couple were. And now he denigrates our lack of giving something of ourselves.

In Obama's new budget released this week, he is trying to reduce or do away with tax deductions for charitable giving, and in a speech he accused parents of spending tuition money on gambling in Las Vegas!  He thinks we do nothing! The betterment of our world, in The Time of Obama, is directing and instructing ACORN, and moving incredible powers into the hands of organizations like them. Believe me, the agenda here is to force all "giving" from the government. if passed, the new budget will bring $291 billion to government coffers, from what was once a deduction to you, over the next ten years.  Congress shot this down early last year. Here it is back again.
 The White House is expecting to collect an additional $291 billion over the next decade by reducing the write-off for families earning over $250,000 despite the fact Congress roundly rejected such a measure last year. While the administration is portraying this as a populist move, experts have said the end result will be a significant blow to charities and non-profits already reeling in the midst of the recession.

Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center said the rule change would make it about 10 percent more expensive for individuals affected to donate to charity. He estimated that would correspond to a $10 billion drop in donations out of the $300 billion Americans give annually.
But here is Obama's real agenda, his secret agenda: enslave the people. Make them come to the government for everything:
Last year the Obama administration defended the move, claiming that the $100 million included in the Recovery Act for charities and non-profits would help cover the gap, along with the natural rise in donations following the economic recovery. Those arguments will be even tougher to make this year with the country still mired in double-digit unemployment and no second stimulus for charities in the works.
I think that can be a naive view, that charities will be specifically helped by getting potential government dollars instead of private dollars they are getting right now,” Riley said. “The idea that private money will be replaced by growth that may or may not happen, government programs that may or may not happen, seems at best a risky bet.”
Okay, that's my rant. Here's the transcript:
Good morning. I want to thank the Co-Chairs of this breakfast, Representatives Heath Shuler and Vernon Ehlers. I’d also like to thank Tony Blair for coming today, as well as our Vice President, Joe Biden, members of my Cabinet, members of Congress, clergy, friends, and dignitaries from across the world.

Michelle and I are honored to join you in prayer this morning. I know this breakfast has a long history in Washington, and faith has always been a guiding force in our family’s life, so we feel very much at home and look forward to keeping this tradition alive during our time here.

It’s a tradition that I’m told actually began many years ago in the city of Seattle. It was the height of the Great Depression, and most people found themselves out of work. Many fell into poverty. Some lost everything.

The leaders of the community did all that they could for those who were suffering in their midst. And then they decided to do something more: they prayed. It didn’t matter what party or religious affiliation to which they belonged. They simply gathered one morning as brothers and sisters to share a meal and talk with God.

These breakfasts soon sprouted up throughout Seattle, and quickly spread to cities and towns across America, eventually making their way to Washington. A short time after President Eisenhower asked a group of Senators if he could join their prayer breakfast, it became a national event. And today, as I see presidents and dignitaries here from every corner of the globe, it strikes me that this is one of the rare occasions that still brings much of the world together in a moment of peace and goodwill.

I raise this history because far too often, we have seen faith wielded as a tool to divide us from one another - as an excuse for prejudice and intolerance. Wars have been waged. Innocents have been slaughtered. For centuries, entire religions have been persecuted, all in the name of perceived righteousness.

There is no doubt that the very nature of faith means that some of our beliefs will never be the same. We read from different texts. We follow different edicts. We subscribe to different accounts of how we came to be here and where we’re going next - and some subscribe to no faith at all.

But no matter what we choose to believe, let us remember that there is no religion whose central tenet is hate. There is no God who condones taking the life of an innocent human being. This much we know.

We know too that whatever our differences, there is one law that binds all great religions together. Jesus told us to "love thy neighbor as thyself." The Torah commands, "That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow." In Islam, there is a hadith that reads "None of you truly believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself." And the same is true for Buddhists and Hindus; for followers of Confucius and for humanists. It is, of course, the Golden Rule - the call to love one another; to understand one another; to treat with dignity and respect those with whom we share a brief moment on this Earth.

It is an ancient rule; a simple rule; but also one of the most challenging. For it asks each of us to take some measure of responsibility for the well-being of people we may not know or worship with or agree with on every issue. Sometimes, it asks us to reconcile with bitter enemies or resolve ancient hatreds. And that requires a living, breathing, active faith. It requires us not only to believe, but to do - to give something of ourselves for the benefit of others and the betterment of our world.

In this way, the particular faith that motivates each of us can promote a greater good for all of us. Instead of driving us apart, our varied beliefs can bring us together to feed the hungry and comfort the afflicted; to make peace where there is strife and rebuild what has broken; to lift up those who have fallen on hard times. This is not only our call as people of faith, but our duty as citizens of America, and it will be the purpose of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships that I’m announcing later today.

The goal of this office will not be to favor one religious group over another - or even religious groups over secular groups. It will simply be to work on behalf of those organizations that want to work on behalf of our communities, and to do so without blurring the line that our founders wisely drew between church and state. This work is important, because whether it’s a secular group advising families facing foreclosure or faith-based groups providing job-training to those who need work, few are closer to what’s happening on our streets and in our neighborhoods than these organizations.

People trust them. Communities rely on them. And we will help them.

We will also reach out to leaders and scholars around the world to foster a more productive and peaceful dialogue on faith. I don’t expect divisions to disappear overnight, nor do I believe that long-held views and conflicts will suddenly vanish. But I do believe that if we can talk to one another openly and honestly, then perhaps old rifts will start to mend and new partnerships will begin to emerge. In a world that grows smaller by the day, perhaps we can begin to crowd out the destructive forces of zealotry and make room for the healing power of understanding.

This is my hope. This is my prayer.

I believe this good is possible because my faith teaches me that all is possible, but I also believe because of what I have seen and what I have lived.

I was not raised in a particularly religious household. I had a father who was born a Muslim but became an atheist, grandparents who were non-practicing Methodists and Baptists, and a mother who was skeptical of organized religion, even as she was the kindest, most spiritual person I’ve ever known. She was the one who taught me as a child to love, and to understand, and to do unto others as I would want done.

I didn’t become a Christian until many years later, when I moved to the South Side of Chicago after college. It happened not because of indoctrination or a sudden revelation, but because I spent month after month working with church folks who simply wanted to help neighbors who were down on their luck - no matter what they looked like, or where they came from, or who they prayed to. It was on those streets, in those neighborhoods, that I first heard God’s spirit beckon me. It was there that I felt called to a higher purpose - His purpose.

In different ways and different forms, it is that spirit and sense of purpose that drew friends and neighbors to that first prayer breakfast in Seattle all those years ago, during another trying time for our nation. It is what led friends and neighbors from so many faiths and nations here today. We come to break bread and give thanks and seek guidance, but also to rededicate ourselves to the mission of love and service that lies at the heart of all humanity. As St. Augustine once said, "Pray as though everything depended on God. Work as though everything depended on you."

So let us pray together on this February morning, but let us also work together in all the days and months ahead. For it is only through common struggle and common effort, as brothers and sisters, that we fulfill our highest purpose as beloved children of God. I ask you to join me in that effort, and I also ask that you pray for me, for my family, and for the continued perfection of our union. Thank you.


Saturday, January 16, 2010

LA Gangland Bus Tour with Lunch: Alfred Lomas Gangland Bus Tour

For $65 you can take a bus tour of the gritty streets home to Los Angeles' gangs. You get lunch too. Former gang member, Alfred Lomas, says he has the promise of the gangs not to shoot at harass the  bus as it makes it way through the areas of some infamous gangland activity. While Chicago has a tour of Al Capone's operations, and Las Vegas has tours of past Mafia crime areas, both are in the past, while gangland is still percolating.

The first bus sold out quickly. Here's what you get in a two-hour tour in the gang capital of the world, and four or five gang members on the bus to keep the curious passengers safe:

...a 12-stop, two-hour journey through what its organizer calls “the history and origin of high-profile gang areas and the top crime-scene locations” of South Los Angeles.

On the right, Los Angeles’s biggest jail, “the unofficial home to 20,000 gang members in L.A.,” as the tour Web site puts it. Over there, the police station that in 1965 served as the National Guard’s command post in the Watts riots. Visit the large swath of concrete riverbed taken over by graffiti taggers, and later, drop in at a graffiti workshop where, for the right price, a souvenir T-shirt or painting can be yours.
You sign away your safety, before boarding the motor coach...but the gangs have promised Lomas they will behave:
And after careful consideration, it was decided not to have residents shoot water guns at the bus and sell “I Got Shot in South Central” T-shirts.
Lomas is hoping to make enough money that he can fund small loans designed to help provide jobs to gang members. Lomas seems to be well thought of and since moving out of gang culture, has devoted his life to helping others. On a daily basis, he drives a food truck for the needy, supported by the Dream Center, a Christian-based social service center.



Sunday, January 3, 2010

Health Care and the Impact on Charitable Donations

While leaving my New Year's greetings at some of my favorite blogs, I made a stop at Observations. James had an article posted on health care and its impact on charitable giving. In a nutshell, it seems Senators Rockefeller and Kerry decided that if only a 35 cent deduction on each charitable dollar was given back to the donor as a tax deduction, that will leave a tidy sum for government to apply to the mammoth cost of their health care bill.

I found this very interesting, and I think you will too. Note that President Obama is prepared to deny a portion of the deduction to taxpayers, who give out of compassion, and then turn around and give big-dollar grants to...whom? You can be certain only Liberal-pet-non-profits will benefit from this new government program, while your church and local organizations suffer. Really, its disgraceful.
Damage from health care reform reached beyond health care boundaries
by James Shott at Observations

Opponents of so-called health care reform believe terrible things will happen if some version of it passes and gets signed into law. Most of the damage will occur in obvious places, such as to doctors and hospitals, to those who are happy with their existing health insurance, and to everyday Americans, whose taxes and cost of living will rise.

But it will also affect areas outside health care, like private charity.

“How can reforming the health care system and health insurance industry affect charities,” you may wonder? It may seem like a weird disconnect, but it does because, like so much of what liberalism attempts in pursuit of a “perfect” society, it produces consequences that either are unforeseen, or those consequences get written off as acceptable sacrifices in order to achieve what liberals see as the greater good. So, if charities suffer in taking over the health care system, that’s okay.

During formulation of the Senate Finance Committee’s health care bill, a group including Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and John Kerry (D-MA) proposed an idea that would raise billions of dollars in additional tax revenue to help offset the enormous costs of the health care takeover by limiting the value of itemized deductions, such as donations to charity. The proposal would hold the value of charitable deductions at 35 cents on a dollar, while the top tax rate rises to more than 39 percent when the Bush tax cuts expire in 2011.

And when Senate Democrats passed their unpopular health care bill in the middle of that snowy night on a strict 60-40 party-line vote, Democrats said “Merry Christmas” to America’s poor by reducing funding for charities that assist them by billions of dollars each year.

Howard Husock, the Vice President of Policy Research and the Director of the Manhattan Institute's Social Entrepreneurship Award, explained that “when a similar proposal was advanced early this year by President Obama, the long-time head of the National Bureau of Economic Research, Martin Feldstein, estimated it would lead to a $7 billion drop in charitable giving.”

Charities have already taken a big hit, according to the Chronicle of Philanthropy, which reported that six of ten United Way chapters saw a decline in giving last year, totaling $4 billion.

Indeed, a coalition of 15 major charitable organizations that are concerned about the situation wrote a letter to Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) stating that “charities have seen an increased demand for their services as individuals and families struggle with financial uncertainty.”

The underlying assumption of the Democrat’s scheme seems to be that “we’ve got to get money from anywhere and everywhere to offset the exorbitant costs of our health care reform, and government can do a better job of spending charitable dollars than people can.” So, to pay for its takeover of one-sixth of the private economy, the federal government now will take money the people intended for the charities they deem important, and will substitute the judgment of individual Americans with the judgment of a federal bureaucracy in deciding how the funding should be used and which charities will get funding.

In preparation for this not-yet-collected treasure, the Obama Administration has already announced the establishment of a new White House Office of Social Innovation which will make grants directly from the White House to individual non-profit organizations.
And, just as some industries jumped on the health care reform and cap-and-trade bandwagons to insure their survival against an overly aggressive government, some non-profit organizations support this idea, putting themselves in the position to attract “government money” that will enable them to survive and thrive, even as charitable donations drop by billions of dollars a year.

When government calls the shots instead of the people, those intended charitable dollars will be used to support the administration’s purposes, not the people’s purposes, and certain “preferred” organizations and causes get a subsidy. “This government-led giving contrasts sharply with the wide-ranging, sometimes quirky, but historically creative nature of American philanthropy,” Mr. Husock said.

Roberton Williams, senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center, said it's impossible to calculate the exact effects of all the tax changes, but he said the overall result is clear – less philanthropic giving. "This will lead people to give less to charities if they behave the way they've behaved in the past," he said. "We've already seen a drop in giving as a result of the economic collapse. On top of that, this will just reduce the amount of giving."

Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag has noted, however, that the recovery act calls for “$100 million to support nonprofits and charities as we get through this period of economic difficulty." Do Senate Democrats and the President really think that taking more money from those citizens with the most to give to charity, and reducing charitable giving, and then replacing billions of lost donations with a few million dollars controlled by the government will have no negative implications?
Will the American people recognize that the measures President Obama and the Congress are promoting will wreck their country in time to stop them?

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Clinton Foundation Donors Revealed

The Clinton's, Bill and Hill, are honoring Barack Obama's commandment that they reveal, annually, all donors to Bill's Clinton Foundation. The latest list is out. Note this oddity:

It gave only cumulative ranges rather than precise donations, and didn't provide a fundraising total.
 In other words, Norway gave $10 million to $25 million. Oman gave $1 million to $5 million. (See the list of donors here)
Saudi businessman Hamza B. Al-Kholi, whose companies operate in the Middle East, Europe and United States...He gave at least $100,000.

Celebrity businessman Donald Trump, who gave $50,001 to $100,000 in all.
What's the difference between a few millions, huh? I think I'll report my charitable giving to the IRS as somewhere between $100,000 and $500,000 and see what happens.

Friday, December 4, 2009

Tiger Woods Tips: No Tips Tiger: Joy Behar Tiger Woods: Charity Begins with Conservatives

Along with being a multi-philandering husband who wants fans to believe he is remorseful, Tiger Woods is said to be a terrible tipper. In fact, he is no tipper at all. Joy Behar had some comments about Tiger and noted that he is no "right-winger," and as a result is not a hypocrite. And how about some insight into the charitable giving of both conservatives and liberals?



Tiger Woods

Tiger doesn't carry money. Kinda like President's and First Ladies. They carry no cash and that is Tiger's excuse as a billionaire who cannot tip for service. He evidentally doesn't even instruct his entourage (you know he has one) to tip for him - as do Presidents.

Tiger is not alone, although he is likely the wealthiest on the list of worst celebrity tippers. John Kerry, Rachel Ray, Michael Moore, Sean Penn, Regis Philbin, Kelly Preston and Bill Cosby (this surprises me), among others, are alleged to be poor tippers.

Here you and I are, just the average working person out here, and we leave tips that are at least adequate, and sometimes more than adequate. I would never consider not leaving a tip unless my service was atrocious and, if that happened, I would be talking to the manager as well as keeping the tip in my pocket.

About Joy Behar and her comments about Tiger, here's one:
JOY BEHAR: Let me say this on his behalf. He has never held himself as one of these pro-marriage, right-wing, kind of guys who is anti-gay. In other words, the guy is not a hypocrite in his personal life.
But...but...Joy listen-up. After a discussion of stars who took a tumble, David Crary in the Tulsa World quotes Tiger (or is this really just about gays, Joy?):
Woods, however, was unique — a globally recognized brand name that evoked impeccability and historical greatness. His sponsors and handlers, his admiring chroniclers in the media, and especially Woods himself contributed to the image-making.  

The public had become jaded and indifferent — they expected Barry Bonds and Marion Jones and Sammy Sosa to fall," said psychologist Stanley Teitelbaum, author of Sports Heroes, Fallen Idols."

"But no one really expected that of Tiger Woods," he said. "Now that it happens to him, people are not as indifferent — there's more disappointment and more disillusionment."

Woods, for all his preoccupation with mastery on the course, had managed throughout his career to be viewed as more than just a golfer — loving son to his parents, civic-minded creator of a foundation serving disadvantaged children, devoted father who said he'd play less golf so he could spend more time with his two young children. 


He didn't embrace social causes, and sometimes there were brief flashes of temper or crudeness. But as far back as 1997, he was on record as welcoming the responsibilities of role model.

"I think it's an honor to be a role model," he was quoted as saying in a Business Week article. "If you are given a chance to be a role model, I think you should always take it because you can influence a person's life in a positive light, and that's what I want to do. That's what it's all about."

If that was Woods' goal, Teitelbaum said it had been achieved.

"In terms of a role model, he's A-one," the psychologist said. "The fans, and especially kids, are desperate to have role models to look up to. ... People have made him the designated sports hero


"When you're among the high-flying and adored, your public will give you unconditional love as long as you continue to perform," Teitelbaum added. "But there's a responsibility to be that much more careful and that much more transparent and, when something does happen, to deal with it openly."
Liberals believe they are not hypocrites because they don't stand for anything. They do a lot of talking about caring for the downtrodden, and their campaigns are all about controlling the downtrodden, but not only do they not tip well, their charitable donations fall far below that of conservatives. From George Will at RealClearPolitics:

-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).

-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.

-- Residents of the states that voted for John Kerry in 2004 gave smaller percentages of their incomes to charity than did residents of states that voted for George Bush.

-- Bush carried 24 of the 25 states where charitable giving was above average.

-- In the 10 reddest states, in which Bush got more than 60 percent majorities, the average percentage of personal income donated to charity was 3.5. Residents of the bluest states, which gave Bush less than 40 percent, donated just 1.9 percent.

-- People who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality" give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.
 I remember Rosie O'Donnell saying in an interview on the subject of Liberals vs. Conservatives and charitable giving, that charity is the responsibility of the government. No, charity seems to begin with conservatives.



Related and Background:

Elin Nordegren Woods Puma? Elin Woods Puma Endorser? Elin Woods Wedding Ring Gone?

Tiger Woods Julie Postle? Julie Purple and Tiger? Another Tiger Trashy Lady?

Tiger Woods and Dr. Anthony Galea: Human Growth Hormone Scandal? 

Elin Woods Moves to Little House with Babies: Tiger Gets the Big House

Jamie Jungers Tiger Woods Together when Tiger's Dad Died

 Florida Department of Children and Families Visit Woods' Home?

See new video of Holly Sampson talking to a reporter about Tiger Woods 12-13-09 

Tiger Woods Loredana Jolie: Tigers Threesomes? Tiger to Quit Golf? Woods Readies Yacht for GetAway?

Tiger Woods Tag Heuer Drops Tiger: Madam Michelle Braun and Tiger Woods Prostitutes?

 
nbsp;Tiger Woods Nude Photos? Tiger Woods San Clothes: Playgirl Nude Tiger Photos?

Breaking: Tiger Woods Joslyn James? Tiger's Porn Star No. 2? Rachel Uchitel Tiger's Pimp?

Tiger Woods Holly Sampson No. 7? Tiger's Possibly 11 Mistresses? Oprah Phones Tiger? 

Rachel Uchitel Miffed - Mistressed Miffed about Girlfriends  

Elin Moves to House No. 2? Elin Woods Leaves Tiger?

Tiger's Mistresses - No. 4, 5 and 6: Jamie Jungers? Mindy Lawton? Cori Rist? 

Byron Bell is Tiger Woods Childhood Friend: Bell Covers for Tiger and Rachel Uchitel 

Neighbor Says Tiger Woods Snored: Jarius Adams is Tiger Woods Neighbor

Tiger Woods Windermere House No. 2? 

Tiger Woods Triple Bogey? Rachel Uchitel Talks? Uchitel, Grubbs and Moquin?

Jesper Parnevik advice to Elin Woods - next time use a driver

TigerTransgressions: Tiger Woods 3 Years Unfaithful?

Tiger Woods Domestic Violence Warrant?

Tiger Woods Accident 

©2007-2012copyrightMaggie M. Thornton