Quantcast

Pages

Showing posts with label Radio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Radio. Show all posts

Friday, July 23, 2010

Ed Schultz Martyr Meltdown over Fox News: Jealous of Brett Baier

Ed Schultz, really peeved that Obama had an interview with Fox News' Brett Baier - in his own time slot, and didn't come to "him," mentions something about no loyalty from the White House. The look on his face tells his story - he's eaten up with sheer jealousy, saying  "I busted my ass for Obama." His face gets even redder when he says Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA 9th) would not promise to tell the Congressional Black Caucus to stay off of Fox News. In this clip, Schultz ends with  "I'm really sorry that Glenn Beck's going blind, because I think it's a travesty he won't see the country he is destroying."
Schultz is host of The Ed Show on MSNBC and the Ed Schultz Show, a syndicated radio talk show.

Ed Schultz



Ed Schultz Martyr Meltdown (video)

Monday, June 14, 2010

Mark Levin Alvin Greene: Jim Clyburn - Greene is a Democrat Plant: Clyburn calls for DOJ Investigation

Mark Levin, the Great One, interviewed Alvin Greene the very controversial Democrat who won the South Carolina Senate primary. Greene, reportedly a graduate of the University of South Carolina with a degree in Political Science, defeated his Democrat opponent, Vic Rawl, who is a judge and a former South Carolina state lawmaker. Some think he won because his name starts with an "A." South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn thinks Greene is a Republican plant. He has asked DOJ to investigate. Yeah, he really did. See videos below.


Alvin M. Greene

Greene might be controversial for several reasons. First might be that he is charged with showing obscene photos to a female student, Camille McCoy, inside the computer lab of the University of South Carolina. Felony charges are pending. Greene won't talk about it. The girl has. See the second video below.

Greene, 32, was honorably discharged from the military, but involuntarily. He is a veteran of 13 years in the Air Force and the Army. He "left" the Air Force in August 2009. Greene won't talk about his military service.

Off topic, but oh well...this sounds like the flip side of Michelle Obama's law license.  All evidence indicates Michelle voluntarily rendered her law license inactive under Rule 770-771 and avoided disciplinary action, possibly disbarment. In the event she wants her license back, she has to begin the process of a "hearing and review" again.

Back to Alvin Greene.

An embarrassed Democrat party says Greene is a Republican plant. Levin pushes him on it and he says he has been a Democrat all of his life and is definitely not a Republican plant. Democrat Congressman James Clyburn, who is always good for a few laughs, and a couple of barf bags each year, has asked the Department of Justice to investigate. Actually, that's no laughing matter because the DOJ is as corrupt and partisan as Code Pink. Maybe we should be concerned.

No one knows where he got the money to run. He says he saved the $10,440 filing fee by saving two years of his military pay.  Levin asks him about it and he repeats that he saved in while enlisted. He didn't campaign, doesn't have a website - or a cell phone. He had no consultants and didn't plant a single yard sign...has $114 in the bank, but won the primary.

Now this is just a rumor. I saw a comment somewhere which shall remain anonymous, who said Greene worked for him in the Air Force and his discharge was an Administrative discharge - saying that Greene was incompetent and couldn't accomplish the simplest of tasks. That's a relief. Greene should do just fine on the Democrat side of the Senate.

In November, Greene will run against Republican icon, Senator Jim DeMint, one of the finest souls in the Senate - actually in the entire city of Washington, D.C. The Washington Post muses that Greene won the primary because his first name, Alvin, starts with an "A." Let the circus begin.





Mark Levin, The Great One, and Alvin Greene (video)

Camille McCoy talks about Alvin Greene (video)

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Rush Limbaugh Kathryn Rogers: Rush Marries Kathryn Rogers Next Week?

Rush has been dieting and losing weight - sure sign that something's up. I'm hearing that he will marry Kathryn Rogers in an "intimate" ceremony at his home, on the beach, at his North Palm Beach home. Here's bits and pieces of the news: (See June 1, 2010 updates below - 2 updates) Today's Update 6-5-10: The wedding is reportedly tonight, in Florida. Elton John will perform. The rehearsal dinner last night was a luau. Read the details here.

Rush Limbaugh and Kathryn Rogers

Rush is 59. Ms. Rogers, said to be a direct descendant of John Adams, is 33. She was or is a party planner for the South Florida Super Bowl host committee.

Rogers and Rush met in 2004. At that time, she worked for golfer Gary Player. Rush was a celebrity guest at the tournament. The gossip is that Rush was in the middle of a divorce from 'Marta.' Rogers and Rush began dating after the Rush-Marta divorce in summer 2007.

Remember the "heart attack" Rush had in Hawaii last January? He was there to meet Kathryn's parents.

Rush Limbaugh's Home

Zev Chafets new book about Rush says the Limbaugh estate is a five-house compound - ocean front, of course. The main house is 24,000 sq. ft. The additional four homes are for guests. The property includes a private beach and a putting green. Read the entire story at Jose Lambiet's Page 2 Live.

If this story is true, I wish Rush and Ms. Rogers every happiness. It cannot be easy to be married and be Rush Limbaugh, and it cannot be easy to be married to Rush - not because of Rush's personality, but because he is a huge talent who knows what he is talking about, is insightful beyond any norm - and thus is a target of every Liberal, all of whom want to be him,  can't get to first base and settle for an unattractive shade of green adorning their faces. God bless you Rush and God bless your marriage.

Photo credit: Jose Lambiet's Page 2 Live

June 1, 2010: 
Well if Limbaugh and Rogers married, we don't know it. An article in Politico in November 2009 said the wedding was set for July 4th. So a few more weeks and we'll see. I think a July 4th wedding is a date Rush would love. OR...

Just saw on Rush's website an announcement that he will be off the show beginning Thursday, until Tuesday, June 15th. No other information. This must be it.

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Megyn Kelly Howard Stern: Megyn Marries Sean, Sleeps with Bill and Kills Glenn: Megyn Kelly on The View

Fox News America Live host, Megyn Kelly went on the Howard Stern show for some reason, I cannot phantom. She also appeared on The View this morning. See that video below. Stern has a little game he likes to play known as "Marry, F, Kill." Stern gave Kelly three names, and she had to choose which she would do what "to" or "with." You don't even have to guess at the names: they were of course Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck. Megyn chose to marry Sean, sleep with Bill, and kill Glenn.

 Megyn Kelly

I predict we will see Bill O'Reilly preening his way through the Talking Points tonight. Also of interest, if you haven't seen it, take a look at the exchange between Megyn Kelly and Bill Burton in this video.


Megyn Kelly on The View (video)

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Mike Malloy Wishes Death to Conservative Rat Bastard Talkers

Mike Malloy, a "progressive" radio talk show host in Atlanta, Georgia calls for the deaths of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly. Malloy expects the "rat bastards" to be the cause of another Murrah Federal Building.

Mike Malloy - Murrah Federal Building 





Mike Malloy on Rat Bastards Limbaugh, Beck and O'Reilly (video)

Read about the death threats to Sarah Palin on Twitter at The Lonely Conservative

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Mark Levin to Sue if Slaughter Rule is Used to Pass Health Care

I reported this earlier in the week, but Mark Levin, a Constitutional attorney and the President of Landmark Legal Foundation confirmed to CNSNews that he will file an immediate lawsuit if House Democrats use an "unconstitutional" manuever to pass the Senate Health Care bill without actually voting on it, a process now dubbed the Slaughter Rule. See a video below.

Levin said he wants to "put the marker down," and make the members of the House aware that they will have an immediate legal challenge "the moment the House acts."

Visit Landmark Legal to see a draft pdf of the complaint. See Levin's statement on why the Slaughter Rule is unconstitutional here.



Mark Levin and Landmark Legal announce a lawsuit  (video)



Related and Background:






Monday, March 15, 2010

Mark Levin on Why the Slaughter Rule is Unconstitutional: Levin Will Take Slaughter Rule to Court

Mark Levin, a Constitutional attorney, as is Barack Obama, explains what is wrong with the Slaughter Rule, expected to be the vehicle that passes health care without both Chambers of Congress voting to pass it into law. Levin said if the legislation should become law through this process, he will be one of many to take it to Court, because it is blatantly unconstitutional, and essentially the same as declaring Martial Law. He ended his remarks by saying if health care is passed with the Slaughter Rule, he will be one of many taking it to court.

Mark Levin

Mark talks about James Madison writing the portion of the Constitution that governs how legislation becomes U.S. law. He points to the detail in the language, and specifics in the Section, and points out that  not everything in the Constitution is detailed, but this is, and for a very good reason...it deals with the laws of our land - "it goes to the heart of this Republic."

The following are Mark's comments. The passage from the Constitution follows his audio, which you can hear for yourself if you would rather listen than read, at The Mark Levin Show. [Note: if you are not familiar with the word 'fiat,' unless talking about the auto, 'fiat' in this case means obtaining a legal right through a short cut. It is Latin for "let it be done," undoubtedly used in Kingdoms all over the world.]
If this is done it will create the greatest Constitutional Crises since the Civil War. It would be 100 times worse than WaterGate. It would be law by fiat, meaning Government by fiat, because there would be no law - just fiat.
The mere discussion by leading officials in our Government of such a grotesque violation of the actual legislative function of Congress, puts us, ladies and and gentlemen, at the brink...at brink. This is why we Conservatives revere the constitution. This is why we stress that the Constitution's words have meaning, and historical context, and they need to be complied with, because otherwise it's anarchy, which leads to tyranny.
This is a crucial lesson for those of you listening, who aren't sure what your beliefs are, if you have any beliefs or don't even care. We have an effort underway, by one of the most powerful chairmen in Congress; a woman who heads the Rules Committee, who determines what goes to the House floor, how it gets voted on, who gets to amend it and all the rest...openly discussion gutting Congress...and if this is done ,this is about as close to Marshall Law as you will get.
Louise Slaughter from New York is discussing Martial Law. I can tell you, if they persue this process and try to impose this kind of law without actually passing a statute, I can assure you I will be in a race with scores of others to the court house to try to stop this.
I can't think of a more blatant violation of the U.S. Constitution than this, and the Liberal media has essentially ignored it. It's not only absurb on its face that these power hungry ideologues - "party-first," "country-second" types, would make the claim that the House voted on something that the House never voted on, is not only  absurd on it's face. It's blatantly unconstitutional.
End Levin's remarks



 U.S Constitution, Article I, Section VII, Clause II.


Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively...


Related and Background:
Pelosi Will Pass Senate Bill in House? Slaughter Rule Ruled Out?

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Rush Limbaugh Mentions Bungalow Bill and Lauds the Points Made

In Rush Limbaugh's third hour today, he mentioned Bungalow Bill's Conservative Wisdom. He said in one hour yesterday we knew more about Tilikum the Killer Whale and his victim, Dawn Brancheau, than we knew about...well...go on over to Bungalow Bill's to read the point that Rush found worthy to mention today. Congratulations Bungalow Bill!

©2007-2012copyrightMaggie M. Thornton