Quantcast

Pages

Showing posts with label Al-Qaeda/Networks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Al-Qaeda/Networks. Show all posts

Monday, November 1, 2010

Jabr Jabran al-Faifi Gives Saudia Arabia Tip on Postal Bombing Attempts

Jabr Jabran al-Faifi is a former detainee of Guantanamo Bay and an al-Qaeda member. It is believed Jabran provided the tip to the Saudi's of last weeks attempted postal parcel bombings.

Jabr Jabran al-Faifi - Photo Credit: Reuters

The DailyMailUK reports that Saudi-born Jabr Jabran is providing "a wealth of intelligence," after "turning his back" on al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).
In an extraordinary move, 35-year-old al-Faifi secretly contacted the Saudi authorities from Yemen and a handover was arranged through officials in the Yemeni capital Sanaa.
US Defence Department documents say one of his aliases was on a captured computer and that in November-December 2001 he was in the Tora Bora area of Afghanistan where Osama Bin Laden and other senior al-Qaeda and Taliban figures were at one stage trapped. 
Jabran was released from Gitmo and sent to Saudi Arabia for "rehabilitation" in December 2006. Later he escaped and fled to Yemen. The "rehabilitation" obviously did not work. The Saudi's say only 11 out of 117 Guantanamo returnees rejoined al-Qaeda.

Posted by Maggie @ Maggie's Notebook

Content Scrapers: Until I can figure out what to do about your confiscation of my work for your own website, please be sure to give a link back as shown above.




Saturday, September 11, 2010

9/11 Tribute We Will Never Forget - Nine Years Later

In honor of all who died, and all who survived and are suffering today, 9 years later, we have not forgotten and we will never forget.

In honor of all who served and died in New York City and on the battlefield, we have not forgotten and we will never forget.

When our children and grandchildren are old enough to bear the pain, they will see how Americans died on September 11, 2001 and they will never forget.

If any American leader attempts to create an environment of forgetfulness, do not fear, we will never forget.

If any of America's enemies use fear as a weapon to move us to ignore what we cannot forget, we will never forget.

Update: My friend at Holger Awakens is in New York City for Pam Geller's Remember Rally  Washington D.C. for the 912 Rally. He left this note here today:

"I’d like to share this: Last night, about 100 or so of us were down at the entrance of Walter Reed Army Medical Center with our “Support the Troops” signs and American flags…there were 3 Code Pinkers. We were on all four corners of the entrance on Georgia Avenue.

About 8:30 p.m., a young soldier, dressed in civvies, appeared at the one corner across the street from me – he was shaking hands with our guys over there. He then proceeded to walk across Georgia Ave to a thunderous round of applause and the car horns blaring from dozens and dozens of cars that stopped as he crossed the street, it took some time as I believe he was fairly new to his prosthetic leg. He met us on our corner, I shook his hand, I told him “thank you for your service, soldier, you have no idea how proud of you I am.” 

He walked across the street two more times as he shook every hand of every person there – his words were simple and heartfelt. 

He said to each of us:
“Thank you for doing this. You just can’t know how much it means to us to see you out here.”
This soldier was 19 or 20 years old.

The fact that this young soldier thanked US, is beyond comprehension.  These are the young Americans who deserve our honor, this day."



Please view a tribute to Laurie Ann Neira who died aboard American Airlines Flight 11.



September 11, 2001 (video)


The following are tributes from my blogging friends.

Amusing Bunni's Musings

Chicago Ray's Regime Report 

Holger Awakens

Monkey in the Middle

The Lonely Conservative

The Reaganite Republican

No Sheeples Here

Conservative Hideout 2.0

Adrienne's Corner

Radarsite

Mind-Numbed Robot

The Daley Gator

Stop the ACLU

Always on Watch

Social Sense

geeeeeZ

American Perspective

teresamerica

Patriot's Corner

An Ol' Broad's Ramblings

The Current

Randy's Roundtable

Right Truth

The Camp of the Saints

Atlas Shrugs announcing Remembrance Rally at Ground Zero September 11, 2010

Bloviating Zeppelin

Caught Him with a Corndog

The Conservative Lady

Proof Positive

Saucy American in NZ

Ruby Slippers

Doug Ross

Conservative Perspective

Drive By Thinking

Feed Your ADHD

GrEaT sAtAn'S gIrLfRiEnD

The Jawa Report

Western Hero

Ms Sparky

Obi's Sister

Potluck

Praesidium Respublicae

The Conservative Pup

Pundit and Pundette

The Amboy Times

Woman Honor Thyself

Conservative Blogs Central

Pirate's Cove

The Right Guy

America's Watchtower

Wake up America

Refugee Resettlement Watch

Wyblog

TOTUS

Political Realities

Third World County

Right in a Left World

GM's Place

North Face Search

My apologies to all whom I've forgotten. It was not intentional. God Bless America.











Sunday, August 15, 2010

Guantanamo Detainee Saeed al-Shihri Threatens Saudi Monarchy: Al-Qaeda Targets Saudi Monarchy, Saudi Christians, Israel

Al-Qaeda's Saeed al-Shihri was detained at Guantanamo, then released and is now in Yemen calling for accelerated jihad within the Saudia Arabian army. Al-Qaeda has "supporters" in the Saudi army. Who knew (of course we knew)....and we are sending arms to the Monarchy at stealth speed? De-throning the Saudi Arabian royals is now officially on the terrorism calendar, according Saeed al-Shihri, who accuses the Saudi monarchy of aiding the U.S. in killing Muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen. The order has gone out to kidnap Saudi princes, ministers and Christian residents of the country, and to attack Israel "from northwestern Saudi Arabia.

Saeed al-Shihri

According to Saeed al-Shihri, who is a Saudi national, some Saudi military members are asking whether they should stay in the "army" or join al-Qaeda in Yemen. The advice given:
“Unite ranks, call for Jihad within your departments, and form Islamic cells to attract whoever can help in military or political organizational work.”
The al-Qaeda leader also called on its followers in the armed forces to attack Israel from northwestern Saudi Arabia. “Carry your arms against Israel, which is only few kilometres away from you,” al-Shihri said. “Whoever among you is a pilot should seek martyrdom in the skies of Palestine, and who works in the navy should aim his weapon at the Jews there.” 
The U.S. embassy has notified U.S. residents of the danger:
The U.S. embassy warned its citizens in the kingdom that it has credible information that unidentified extremists may be planning to attack western nationals in al-Qassim province north of Riyadh, according to a Warden Message on its website dated Aug. 4. The timing and method of potential attacks aren’t known, according to the statement.
Al-Shihri is suspected of involvement of the Yemen U.S. Embassy in September 2008, and as an al-Qaeda member held at Guantanamo, he is one of approximately 61 believed to have returned to the battlefield after release.

In the meantime, the U.S. has devised a continued arms sale package to Saudi Arabia, considered the biggest overseas U.S. arms sale in our history. The al-Saud family has a lot at stake. They need us and we need them, but what happens after the Iranian nuclear threat to the area is gone? Think how this story might different had we dealt with Iran several years ago. Jihad Watch has more.

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Samir Khan and Omar Hammami: American al-Qaeda: Samir Khan Escapes US Not on NoFly List

I noticed a lot of traffic today on a post I did on American Omar Hammami, also known as Abu Mansour al-Amriki. Some of that traffic, although not all, was coming from Saudi Arabia. I searched around for the source of the recent interest and found that another American, Samir Khan, is believed to be behind a new online English language magazine for al-Qaeda named Inspire. This makes the fourth known America-born Al-Qaeda member. Khan, a New Yorker, produced a similar online militant blog before he disappeared, thanks for no listting on a no-fly list. He is believed to be in Yemen. The new blog-magazine says it was posted by al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

Samir Khan

Khan's new website featured an English-language recruiting video by Omar Hammami, another American born member of al-Qaeda. The video, in English, is targeted to the English speaking Somali's inside the U.S. In this NY Daily News article, one of our own favorite terror blogs, The Jawa Report mentioned where I found this post dated July 28, 2010 saying that when Khan fled the U.S. he was well-known to intelligence for being attached to terrorists and terrorism, yet he apparently was not on a no-fly list.

Omar Hammami

FrontPageMagazine has this quote from Khan:
Islam denounces democracy, Islam denounces Christians and Jews, Islam denounces the corruption of the disbelievers upon the earth, and Islam is coming to crush the armies of disbelief and smash the false government and religions of the world to bring humanity from darkness into light,” wrote.
Samir Khan was born in Saudi Arabia but his family moved to Queens when he was 7-years-old. He became radicalized when at age 15 he attended a summer camp sponsored by the Islamic Organization of North America (IONA). Over the years the family moved to New Jersey and finally to Charlotte, North Carolina in 2004, which explains the numerous visitors I had today from that state. So yes, this also begs the question asked by Rusty Shackelford at The Jawa Report, how was this guy allowed to leave this country and operate openly out of Yemen? That gives us four know American-born al-Qaeda from the U.S.: Adam Gadahn, Omar Hammami, Samir Khan and Anwar al-Awlaki - who has the distinction of being on a White House targeted kill list.

Background and Related:
American Omar Hammami is Abu Mansour al-Amriki

Monday, July 12, 2010

Nate Henn Dies in Terrorist Bombing Uganda: Nate Henn Invisible Children

An American man, Nate Henn, has died in the Uganada terrorist bombing during a World Cup watch party. The bombers are believed to be members of Somalian al-Shabab, an al-Qaeda-aligned organization. Three bombs went off within a 50 minute period killing 64, and maybe a dozen more.

Nate Henn

Mr. Henn, 25, was a resident of Delaware and a volunteer for Invisible Children, an organization trying to free "child soldiers" in African wars, and also trying to tell their stories through film.
The radical Islamist movement al-Shabab which has implemented sharia law across large swathes of Somalia, said today the attacks were revenge for the presence of Ugandan soldiers in the Somali capital. "We are not afraid to say that we are behind the Uganda attack," al-Shabab spokesman Sheik Ali Mohamud Rage said in a phone interview from the Somali capital Mogadishu. "We have made the [Ugandan] government to feel the pain that they are causing us in Mogadishu."
 Al-Shabab says they are seeking revenge for Uganda's participation in peacekeeping missions in Somalia, and Ugandan officials quote Sheik Yusuf Sheik Issa, a Shabab commander saying "Uganda is a major infidel country supporting the so-called government of Somalia."

Henn was at the Kyandondo Rugby Club bombings along with 3,000 others, when the second or third of the three blasts exploded. Mr. Henn had been with Invisible Children for about 18 months, arriving in Uganda on July 3rd, 2010.
Despite being in Uganda for such a short time, Henn had won the admiration of his pupils, many of who had been abducted as children and enlisted in the rebel Ugandan group, the Lord's Resistance Army
"Our Ugandan students ... fell in love with Nate's wit, strength, character and steadfast friendship," the eulogy read. "They gave him the Acholi name 'Oteka,' which means 'The Strong One.'"
Several Ugandan students were with Henn at the time of the explosion. It is not known if any died in the attack.
Six members of a church group from Pennsylvania, were wounded in the blast in the Ethiopian restaurant. One of the wounded was 16-year-old  American Emily Kerstetter. Three Ugandan members of the group were killed.
Mr. Henn was an alum of University of Delaware.

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Osama bin Laden in Savzevar, Iran with Ayman al-Zawahiri: What do we do now?

Not surprising, but what do we do now that we know? Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri have enjoyed Iranian hospitality for 5 years, along with three other unnamed "high-ranking" al Qaeda members. Home to bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri has been the town of Savzevar or Sabzevar

Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri

Turkey has been in on the secret, according to Kuwaiti sources:
Savzevar, a small town of about a quarter of a million inhabitants, is connected by road toTehran and Mashhad and has a small airport. A center for producing grapes and raisins, its location is remote and difficult to access because it is enclosed by lofty mountains and a salt desert 50,000 square kilometers in area.
DEBKAfile's counter-terror sources disclose that the purpose of airing their precise whereabouts at this time, aside from implicating the Turkish leader, was first, to warn al Qaeda's leaders that their hideout was blown and they had better move on - which would make them easier to catch; and, second, to nudge US president Barak Obama into a decision to go after them. 
Really, what do we do now? Bin Laden is in Iran...and we know it, and...what do we do now? Read the story at DEBKAfile, including what American intelligence knew about American targets by mid-May, 2010. As you will read in the DEBKAfile, they have a theory about why this story is breaking now, and that basically is, since Kuwait broke the story to get these two scumbags on the run so they can be hunted down by the good guys. Holger Awakens, on the other hand, has another theory. Read it at Holger Awakens.

Linked by:
teresamerica - Thanks Teresa!
Storm'n Norm'n - Thanks Norm!

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Gaza Flotilla's Al Qaeda Members: Gaza Flotilla Infiltrated: Hamas Refuses Flotilla Aid

YNetNews reports the Gaza Flotilla had al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood members on board. Were the "peace" activists secretly infiltrated? In addition to Turks, there were Yemenites and Indonesians that fit the description of "terrorists." In an odd twist, Hamas has refused the aid aboard the Flotilla until Israel releases the terrorists. See a video below.

Graphic: Ramirez at Investor's Business Daily

YNet:
Some among that group are believed to have ties with World Jihad groups, mainly al-Qaeda.
...it is clear that the majority were recruited by the same IHH handler who organized the flotilla.
IHH is a Turkish humanitarian relief fund with a radical Islamic anti-Western orientation.
Some of the suspects were found to be carrying large sums of money. Others had Kevlar vests and gas masks; and all were found to be carrying weapons such as knives, metal clubs and slingshots.
Ignoring all evidence, a HuffPo columnist, Robert Naiman had this headline: Gaza Freedom Flotilla Shows Awesome Power of Nonviolent Resistance.

Hamas is refusing to accept Flotilla aid, which included Kevlar vests, night vision goggles, and some claim $1 million was on board, until Israel releases all al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood members.

The first video below shows boxes of plates thrown at Israeli IDF, a stun grenade was thrown in the boat, water cannons were used, and see the metal bars and heavy chain link used. (The graphic and video found at Muqata's). The second video shows live fire coming at the IDF. Hear the Israeli military calling for reinforcements. 





Flotilla Terrorists Attack IDF Before Boarding (video)




Terrorists Fire Live Ammo at IDF (video)

Thanks to GatewayPundit here.

Related and Background:
American Emily Henochowicz Loses Eye in Terror Flotilla Protest

Young Jewish Man Carries Israeli Flag in LA Muslim Street Protest (Video)

Gaza Flotilla Terror Choir: We Con the World (Video)

Furkan Dogan American Dead on Gaza Flotilla

Hamas Flotilla Aid Refused

Gaza Flotilla - al Qaeda Members Aboard

Susan Rice, American UN Ambassador Skips Terror Flotilla Discussions at UN

Flotilla War Atmosphere before Israel Boarded - Martyrdom or Gaza Shores


The Angst of Supporting Israel
Who and What are Palestinians?
Rupert Murdock: U.S., European Survival Without Israel


Without Support, What Happens to Israel?
Golda Meir: War and Wisdom
About that Two-State Solution
How the Gaza Tunnels into Egypt Work
Discovering Kryptonite, Disabling Superman
United Nations Condemns Hamas - Gotcha!
United Nations Seal Condemnation of Israel

In a class of its own:
Gaza Flotilla Terror Choir: We Con the World Video

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Mohamed Ali Homeland Security Terror Watch for Texas Border: Terror Alert at Texas/Mexico Border Video

Mohamed Ali is not the Cassius Marcellus Clay, Jr. or Muhammad Ali you and I know. This Mohamed Ali is a Somali man believed to be in Mexico and preparing to cross the Mexico border with Texas into the U.S. Homeland Security has issued a "terror watch," for the man believed to have ties to Al Shabaab, a Somali terrorist organization with strong ties to al-Qaeda. See video below.

An indictment was unsealed in Texas federal court earlier this month that revealed that a Somali man, Ahmed Muhammed Dhakane, led a human smuggling ring that brought East Africans, including Somalis with ties to terror groups, from Brazil and across the Mexican border and into Texas. 
The same Fox News report says "hundreds of Somalis suspected of terrorist ties" have crossed the porous and ignored U.S. border.
In recent years, American Somalis have been recruited by Al Shabaab to travel to Somalia, where they are often radicalized by more extremist or operational anti-American terror groups, which Al Shabaab supports. The recruiters coming through the Mexican border are the ones who could be the most dangerous, according to law enforcement officials.
And our friends in Mexico:

In addition to the Somali immigration issue, Mexican smugglers are coaching some Middle Eastern immigrants before they cross the border – schooling them on how to dress and giving them phrases to help them look and sound like Latinos, law enforcement sources told FoxNews.com.




There have been a number of certain communities that have noticed this, villages in northern Mexico where Middle Easterners try to move into town and learn Spanish,” Neuhaus Schaan said. “People were changing there names from Middle Eastern names to Hispanic names.”

Security experts say the push by illegal immigrants to try to fit in also could be the realization of what officials have feared for years: Latin American drug cartels are helping jihadist groups bring terrorists across the Mexican border. 
Every U.S. Representative and Senator holding office for more than 5 years should be voted out of office for allowing American vulnerability on our Southern Borders. Immediately, we should hold all law enforcement responsible for refusing to follow U.S. immigration laws. Every sanctuary city must lose all federal funding. The following, very interesting video, is courtesy of KVUE.com (Houston).





Homeland Security Alert for Mohamed Ali (video)

Sunday, May 2, 2010

Senator Inhofes Office on SB3081: McCain SB3081 Holding Americans Indefinitely Without Trial

Last week, I posted on Senator John McCain's Senate Bill 3081 which, if passed, will allow American citizens suspected of terrorism to be held indefinitely without trial, and/or put through the military court system. Senator James Inhofe is one of the surprising co-sponsors of this bill titled "Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010. I spoke to Brandon Andrews in Inhofe's office about the bill, which he seemed well acquainted with.

 Jim Inhofe

Taliban American Adam Gadahn and al-Qaeda Anwar al-Awalaki were discussed. There is no doubt it is a new day in America, and there is an obvious need to find a way to handle American jihadists. Can we find a way to adhere to the U.S. Constitution and bring non-military Americans to a military trial? And how in the world did these Senators let this bill get this far?

First, this bill is clearly not in line with the Fifth or Sixth Amendments which says an American citizen cannot be held for capital crimes without the benefit of a Grand Jury indictment, and citizens must have the right to a speedy and public trial."  (See the text of both amendments at the bottom of this article.)

Brandon Andrews stressed that an American citizen, under SB3081 would not have the privilege of a Grand Jury if found to be a high-value detainee, but the bill provides for a final determination of the citizen's status by certain members of Congress, and the determination is to be made within 48 hours. If the detainee is determined not to be a "high-value detainee," or "Unprivileged Enemy Belligerent," then the citizen moves into the federal court system, or is released, and is out of the reach of SB3081.

If the citizen is deemed to be a "high-value detainee," or an "Unprivileged Enemy Belligerent," the the citizen is covered by SB3081, and is not entitled to a civilian court, a Grand Jury or a speedy trial.

I asked about al-Qaeda being specified in the bill, but not the Taliban. I asked about American Adam Gadahn, a Taliban al-Qaeda leader, and was surprised to learn that Gadahn is not covered by this bill, because Afghanistan is a sensitive subject, these days. So, theoretically, and realistically, if Gadahn is captured, he will go through a civilian court.

If American Anwar al-Alwalki, a cleric in Yemen with 9/11 terrorist ties, as well as ties to Ft. Hood shooter, Nidal Malik Hasan, is captured he qualifies for SB3081.

I asked if a non-military American citizen has ever been tried in a military court. He said they had, and said he just had that information in front of him, but couldn't pull it up at that moment. He said he would email the information. At one point he said I should have it in 10 minutes. After the phone conversation, the email did not come. I called him back. He said he would re-send it. I sent him an email to verify my email address. I still have not received the information, and have left a couple of voicemails for him but he has not returned the calls. This is unlike the way Inhofe's office usually works.

From my own search, I did find a couple of instances of non-military citizens in military courts, but they were in the 1800's. In 1866, Ex parte Milligan was decided in the U.S. Supreme court, ruling it unconstitutional for non-military citizens to be tried in military tribunals when civilian courts are still operating. That decision arose from 5 Americans planning to steal Union weapons and invade Union prison-of-war camps. SCOTUS found that military tribunals were illegal in states upholding the U.S. Constitution.

We have large numbers of American citizens joining the Islamic jihad effort, and we are increasingly at jeopardy from those citizens here, and those who have gone to Islamic countries to train. There is no doubt, it is a new day in America.

According to Brandon Andrews, there are some 3,000 Americans in Yemen in training camps right now. Yemen cleric Anwar al-Awlaki is a good example. He is New Mexico born-and-bred, but has fled to Yemen. It is alleged he had numerous contacts with jihadists in America: meeting with two of the 9/11 hijackers, correspondence with Fort Hood murderer, Nidal Malik Hasan, and perhaps he motivated Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

President Obama has approved the "targeted killing" of al-Awalaki.

During my phone conversation, there was no conclusion from Senator Inhofe's spokesman, Brandon Andrews, about how this bill works with the U.S. Constitution. According to Mr. Andrews, there is probably language in SB3081 that needs a review or clarification.

For your reference, here is the text of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments:
Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the mIlitia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for he same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitutionthe
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of counsel for his defence.
Back to my question of how these distinguished Senators let this poorly written legislation get this far, I don't have the answer but will venture a guess: perhaps the routine is that the "needs" are put on paper in the form of a bill, with all it's warts and pimples, in the hope they then get fleshed out in committees.

Related and Background:
John McCain's SB 3081 Holds Americans Indefinitely without Trial

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Abdulmutallab Underwear Bomber in Terrorist Training Camp: Christmas Day Bomber seen in Terrorist Training Camp

See the Underwear, Christmas Day bomber in a terrorist training camp, and filming his "martyrdom" video. He is firing at the Israeli flag, the Star of David and drones in the sky. See it in the video below.

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab

There were numerous eye-witness reports of an older man who was with Abdulmutallab in the airport, before boarding Northwest Flight 253. This "older man," according to passenger Kurt Haskell, helped Abdulmutallab secure a ticket without proper documents. Mr. Haskell's reports went nowhere. What do we know about this man?






Abdulmutallab seen in Terrorist Training Camps (video)




Related and Background:

Monday, April 19, 2010

Abu Ayyub al Masri Dead in Iraq? Abu Omar al Baghdadi Dead in Iraq?

Al Qaeda leaders Abu Ayyub al-Masiri and Abu Omar al Baghdadi are reportedly confirmed dead in Iraq according to that country's prime minister, Nouri al Maliki. I'll have continuing updates as information is available. See update below.






Abu Ayyub al Masri
 

       

Abu Omar al Baghdadi
 
Maliki says the men were killed this past weekend, and offered photos of two bodies to reporters. Al Masri and al Baghdadi were allegedly hiding in a home in or near Tikrit, the hometown of Saddam Hussein.

One caution about this report:
The Iraqi government has claimed multiple times over that it had either captured or killed al Bafhdadi, most recently a year ago.

Update 4-20-10, 7:40 p.m. EST:
Iraq says they have confirmed the deaths of both men through DNA, but some analysts are still not completely convinced about the death of al Baghdadi. Some of the problems in identifying Abu Omar al Baghdadi stem from believing the al Baghdadi name was used for numerous Iraqi terrorists. In fact, they are not completely certain there is actually a man named Abu Omar al Baghdadi.

Sunday, March 7, 2010

Adam Gadahn Arrested: American al Qaeda Adam Gadahn Arrested in Pakistan

Everytime I think about Adam Gadahn, I think of a story I read of his younger brother trying to live and get beyond his brother's reputation while attending school. Today we hear that Adam Gadah (Azzam the American and Azzam al-Amereeki and Abu Yahya Mujahdeed Al-Adam) has been arrested in Pakistan. While we always have to wait for confirmation, and acknowledge that the report could be incorrect, it is good to think this man is under arrest. Updates below. Apparently Adam Gadahn has not been apprehended.  Update 3-8-10: Maybe it is Gadahn!!! See below. IT'S NOT GADAHN!

From Dawn.com - Allegedly Adam Gadahn "en sack"



Adam Gadahn

Adam Gadahn (31) is a close associate to Osama bin Laden, and is considered the American spokesperson for al-Qaeda. There were numerous previous reports that he was dead, all of which turned out to be false. This report says Gadahn was arrested by "security and commando forces" in Pakistan. Gadahn was indicted for treason in 2006 for a capital crime of aiding an enemy of the United States.

The New York Daily News reports that Karachi's English-language newspaper, The Dawn, was the first report of the arrest and broke the story showing "a photo of a man being taken away with a bag on his head."

Gadahn moved in with his grandparents in Santa Ana, California, and began the study of Islam at the Islamic Society of Orange County, California. He converted one year later. His paternal grandfather, Carl Perlman, was a Jewish zionist. Adam's parents, Phil and Jennifer Perlman reportedly changed their name from Perlman to Gadahn after the Biblical warrior Gideon. The report linked above from the NY Daily News refers to Phil Gadahn as a "hippie." Adam is believed to have moved in with his grandparents when he was 17, but it is not clear which set of grandparents.
Gadahn reportedly moved to Pakistan in 1998, where he married an Afghan refugee and maintained intermittent contact with his family.

Adam Gadahn in 1997 mugshot

Gadahn recently made news, according to Katherine Herridge, reporting on FOXNews, saying Major Nidal Hassan, the Fort Hood killer, was a hero and will be blessed by Allah. This comment  is seen as significant in that it lowers the bar for martyrdom, and Gadahn essentially told Muslims they need not die in the quest to kill Westerners to receive the blessings of Allah. He has repeatedly been seen, or his voice heard, in al-Qaeda videos. In the video below, Gadahn speaks English at about 1:10 minutes in. I'll have more as updates are available.

Update 3-7-10:
Three sources are reporting Gadahn is not in custody:

Ace of Spades
CBS
BBC

Update 3-8-10
See this update from Cassy Fiano at Stop the ACLU - here's a snippet:
There’s been confusion over whether or not Gadahn is who was captured. It seems that if it wasn’t Gadahn, then it was some other American traitor who deserves to get executed mercilessly. The AP has updated their story, and Pakistani officials are saying that an American who has been charged with treason was captured. Sounds like Gadahn, right? But US officials haven’t confirmed the story.
Also, extraordinarily savvy newshound, Larwyn, said this about 10 PM EST last night (Sunday):
CNN in 10pm newscast also INSISTING it is GADAHN!!  They have TWO PAKISTANI OFFICIALS CONFIRMING.  





Adam Gadahn - American al-Qaeda


Linked by Right Juris - Thank you Jo!

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Eric Holder Charles Grassley: The Al Qaeda Nine: Megyn Kelly Charles Grassly DOJ Video

Attorney General Eric Holder hired nine lawyers who previously defended accused al Qaeda members. These lawyers now work out of the Department of Justice. The DOJ has not been forthcoming with the names of the lawyers or the cases they are connected to. If it was proper to defend accused al Qaeda in private practice, why should their names not be released? So what is DOJ hiding? We have the right to know. Fill our Justice Department with jihadist sympathizers, and we have the right to know. See a current Megyn Kelly video below.

Eric Holder and Barack Obama

The third ranking Associate Attorney General, Thomas J. Perrelli recused himself from 39 cases of terrorist detainees because he had had participated in prior proceedings before coming to Justice, or had in some way been affiliated with - 39 cases, an astonishing number. Whole careers are being made by defending those wanting to attack our country.

Perelli, you'll remember, allowed the case against the New Black Panthers to drop, even with considerable eyewitness evidence, and a video, that voter intimidation took place at a Philadelphia polling place. The three New Black Panthers involved were Muslim, as are the detainees.

Senator Charles Grassley (R-IW), joined by fellow Republican members of the Judiciary Committee,  requested the names of all detainee cases from which DOJ attorneys were recused, along with the names of the lawyers defending them. Three months later Grassley received a letter from a Holder aide, Ronald Welch, filled with what Grassley characterized as "bureaucratic mumbo-jumbo that failed to answer" his simple questions. The press had reported the names of Neal Katyal, who represented Osama bin Laden's drive and Jennifer Kaskal who worked for Human Rights Watch.

Welch told Grassley at least nine lawyers at DOJ represented detainees or worked on amicus briefs on the behalf of detainees, but provided names for only two.

Grassley's response:
The country has the right to know what the predilections of people in the Ustice Department are toward terrorism, especially if they're giving constitutional rights to terrorists. To me, this is a case of our public servants or political appointees having an agenda of their own instead of being concerned with the national security of the United States.
This letter [from Welch] creates a lot of suspicion about conflicts of interest. Without the names and details, we have a reason to question what's really going on here.
This from the Washington Times:
Here's what we do know: In March, the Legal Times named 14 Justice Department lawyers whose firms at leaset did significant detainee work and who therefore might need recusals in specific cases. They included Mr. Holder himself, Mr. Perrelli, then-Deputy Attorney General David J. Ogden, and a list of mid-to-high-ranking underlings that includes lawyers James Garland, John Bies, Aaron Lewis, Stuart Delery, Eric Columbus, Chad Golder, Bran Hauck,Donald Verrilli, Lanny Breuer, Tony West and Neal Katyal.
Mr. Grassley added the name of Jennifer Daskal, who was known as a particularly avid promoter of the terrorist detainees.
The DOJ held the information close and revealed little. According to the New York Times, Holder has not been helpful.
Mr. [Eric] Columbus, himself, not just someone from his former law firm, was an attorney of record in portions of the landmark case of Boumediene v. Bush where a divided Supreme Court ruled that detainees so enjoy access to U.S. Courts.

This is important because Mr. Columbus' job as senior counsel for the deputy attorney general gives him some supervisory authority over both the Criminal and National Security divisions of the Justice Department - the very divisions involved with deciding how to handle the detainees.
The Washington Times speculates that another of the unnamed lawyers is Jonathan G. Cederbaum who worked on the Boumediene case.

Holder insists that there is nothing unusual about an attorney once defending an opposing side, now contributing to the prosecutorial side, but this is different. This is about national security, and it a place we haven't been before. Eric Holder has been at war with America since he took office - and maybe before.

Grassley tells Megyn Kelly, if they do not provide the names "they are going to regret it." You'll hear that there is a $500 million budget to do something with these terrorists - or not.


Megyn Kelly and Charles Grassley (video)
Eric Holder's Al Qaeda Lawyers in the Department of Justice


Others talking about DOJ Evasions and Terrorism:
Keep America Safe

Related:

Turning over America to World Control: Eric Holder Blames America Again

Newt Gingrich on Eric Holder's Defense of Yemeni Terrorist's Rights

Eric Holder and Sharon Malone Holder: The Uncommonly Elegant Pair

Sunday, January 17, 2010

US Searching for Two-Man al-Qaeda Team

Your daily terrorism alert, courtesy the Brits (Mirror) via RightTruth

American security forces were last night searching for a two-man al-Qaeda team about to attack.

Airports are on high alert as experts think the terrorists from the Yemen are on their way - but they could already be in the country.

Security analysis seen by the Mirror says the Christmas bomb plot by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, 23, was a test run. They think it was to see if his underpants explosives plan would work. The document says: "Two people suspected of plotting further attacks are being pursued."

Friday, January 8, 2010

Helen Thomas Shills for Terrorists Video

Helen Thomas, the veteran "reporter" asks Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and President Obama's Deputy Security Advisor, John Brennan, to explain the motive for jihadist attacks against America. Nothing would make Helen happier than hearing, from the White House press room, where she has spent most of her, ahem...professional life, the declaration that America's aggression in Muslim lands has spurred Koranic fury against Western infidels. That's the answer she wanted, and it is shameful that she can shill for terrorists from the White House.

Thomas was born in Kentucky to Christian parents of Lebanese descent. She is restive about Israel, and that's putting it mildly. Thomas preens in the limelight of her leading questions, always designed to put Israel in the role of a demon. While she never talks about the democratic Israel, she certainly also never speaks of the human rights abuses of Muslims on Muslims, or the billions from the West which never seem to advance the country's food, education or clothing supply, but instead arms Hamas. Listen to John Brennan, who dances as fast as he can.




Helen Thomas and John Brennen (video)

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Anwar Awlaki dead? Nidal Hasan cleric dead? Nasser al-Wahayshi dead?

Anwar Awlaki, the cleric who corresponded with Fort Hood jihadist killer, Nidal Hasan, may be dead in Yemen after a U.S. air strike. Also believed dead is the al-Qaeda leader in Yemen, Nassar al-Wahayshi and his deputy Saeed al-Shehri. See update below.


Anwar Awlaki

Anwar Awlaki is a U.S.-born Yemeni scholar from Las Cruces, New Mexico. He moved from California to the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Great Falls, Virginia in 2001. Two of the 9-11 hijackers are known to have worshipped there. A third hijacker attended his services in California. Nidal Hasan attended the mosque and his mother's funeral was held at Dar al-Hijrah. Thirty are believed to dead in the U.S. airstrike in eastern Yemen, with Awlaki thought to be among them.
"The raid was carried out as dozens of members of Al Qaeda were meeting in Wadi Rafadh," a source told AFP, referring to a rugged location about 400 miles east of the capital.
A Yemeni official, also speaking on condition of anonymity to AFP, said those attending the meeting "planned to launch terrorist attacks against economic installations in Yemen, in retaliation for Yemeni strikes launched last week." 

The Sunni Muslim Ummah forum is chatting that a Yemen news source says the Awlaki killed was not the cleric Awlaki, but perhaps someone in his "famous" Awlaki tribe.

Al-Qaeda in Yemen recently changed its name to al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, in an attempt to revive al-Qaeda in Saudia Arabia, where they have been thwarted by a three-years armed counter-terrorism campaign.


Abu Bashir Nasser al-Wayhayshi


Nasser al-Wahayshi was named the new group's Yemeni leader, and made news when he called for the overthrow of the Saudi royal family. Find an interesting interview with al-Wayhayshi here.

I'm assuming the death of his close confident, Anwar Awlaki, will grieve the very pious Nidal Hasan. Let's hope this guy is dead.

Stay tuned.

Update 12-25-09:
There is still no official denial or confirmation that Awlaki is dead. The HuffingtonPost is reporting "friends and relatives" saying that he is alive. While some al-Qaeda are saying that they were present during the airstrike and Awlaki is not dead, they will not answer the question: was Awlaki present at the meeting.


Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Bin Laden Family Found: Bin Laden Family "Forgotten Victims of 9/11"

Some of Osama bin Laden's closet family have been found hiding out in a secret compound in Tehran, Iran. They want to leave the country and say they are the "forgotten victims of 9/11."


Clockwise from top left: Osama Bin Laden and his 10-year-old son Ali; Saad bin Laden; Omar Ossama bin Laden with his wife Zaina; Ossman bin Laden; and Muhammad and Bakr bin Laden

Omar Ossama bin Laden, 29, the Al Qaeda leader’s fourth-eldest son, said he had no idea that his brothers and sisters were still alive until they called him in November. They told him how they had fled Afghanistan just before the 9/11 attacks and walked to the Iranian border. They were taken to a walled compound outside Tehran where guards said they were not allowed to leave "for their own safety". The eldest of the children, Saad, was 20 at the time, Ossman 17, Muhammad 15, Fatma 14, Hamza 12, Iman 9, and Bakr, 7.
There had been speculation that Muhammad was second in command of al-Qaeda and that Saad also instigated and plotted terrorist attacks until he was killed about 18 months ago by an American drone. The relatives, however, said that Muhammad is still living in the compound and that Saad ran away less than a year ago in an attempt to find his mother.
A week after making contact with her brother, Iman escaped during a rare trip outside the compound and made her way to the Saudi Arabian Embassy. She is now living there while seeking permission to leave Iran.

Mr bin Laden said that his relatives live as normal a life as possible, cooking meals, watching television and reading. They are allowed out only rarely for shopping trips. As a number of families are being held in the compound some of the older siblings have been able to marry and have their own children. “The Iranian Government did not know what to do with this large group of people that nobody else wanted, so they just kept them safe. For that we owe them much gratitude, and thank Iran from the depth of our heart,” he said.

Mr bin Laden, who had lived with his father in exile in Sudan and Afghanistan but left before the 9/11 attacks, now hopes that the family will be given permission to leave Iran and join his mother, brother and two sisters in Syria, or himself and his wife in Qatar.

He said: “They are all just innocent victims, just the same as anyone else hurt by the dreadful events of 9/11 and 7/7. These babies and children have never had any education, never hurt a single soul, never trained with any weapons or ever been part of al-Qaeda. We just want to be together as a family. I have now got 11 nieces and nephews, born either in Afghanistan or Iran that I have never seen.

“Some may find this story unnerving, but the child can’t be judged by the sins of their father.”
 Saad bin Laden was released by Iran in late 2008. It is believed that he was killed in an American Hellfire missile strike from a Predator drone in Pakistan in July 2009.

Eman bin Laden, the 17-year-old daughter of Osama bin Laden fled the Iranian compound and made her way to the Saudia Arabian Embassy in October or November 2009, where she has received asylum. More.
Another bin Laden son, Abdullah, who lives in Saudi Arabia, told the Arab TV news network Al-Jazeera in an interview aired this week that Eman telephoned him after she eluded guards who were taking her on a shopping trip in Tehran.

Osama bin Laden reportedly has 19 children by several wives. He took at least one of his wives and their children with him to Afghanistan in the late 1990s after he was thrown out of his previous refuge, Sudan. They fled when the U.S-led war erupted, including the group that tried to escape through Iran....
Most of the al-Qaida leader's children, like Omar, live as legitimate businessmen. The extended bin Laden family, one of the wealthiest in Saudi Arabia, disowned Osama in 1994 when Saudi Arabia stripped him of his citizenship because of his militant activities. Osama bin Laden's billionaire father Mohammed, who died in 1967, had more than 50 children and founded the Binladen Group, a construction conglomerate that gets many major building contracts in the kingdom.
Source and Photo Credit: TimesOnline

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Somalia Suicide Bomber Dressed as a Woman Kills 13

The following story is of a med school graduation in Mogadishu at the Shamo Hotel. A suicide bomber, dressed as a woman, detonated his vest and killed the country's Ministers of Health, Education and Higher Education, nine medical students and a physician. Many more were wounded. As Holger says below, these people are not human.

by Holger at Holger Awakens

Chances are 99.9999% that this attack was conducted by al-Shabaab, which is the notorious arm of al Qaeda in Somalia - an attack that saw three major government ministers killed while they were attending a medical school graduation.



Somalia Suicide Bomber kills 13


Fitting isn't it? Imagine a graduation ceremony where students have slaved away for years to take their doctors' degrees and tend to the sick and injured of one of the world's most poor countries....and on this day, al Qaeda's servants in Somalia blow up the event. That is terror, folks. That is also the definition of cowardice. I should also mention that the suicide bomber dressed himself up as a woman. Yeah, al Qaeda's a bunch of real macho warriors, aren't they?

Here's some of the story from The Long War Journal:
Three government ministers and two reporters are among 19 Somalis who were killed in a Shabaab suicide attack in the capital of Mogadishu.
The suicide bomber, who was disguised as a woman, detonated his vest in the midst of a graduation for Somali medical students from Banadir University. The ceremony was being held at the Shamo Hotel, one of a handful of locations still under government control in Mogadishu. [See video below for scenes from the attack].
The ministers of health, education, and higher education, along with two reporters from Shabelle and Al Arabia, nine medical students, and a well-known doctor were killed in the blast. Scores more were wounded, including the sports minister.
I rarely put up posts about Somalia as I consider it a complete lost cause but occasionally, it's a good reminder of the extent to which the islamists will resort.

These aren't humans. These are programmed messengers of Satan.

By the way, why don't all of you keep your eyes peeled for reactions across the world from muslim leaders and activists denouncing this attack. Please put into comments here all of the reactions of outrage you find from muslims in other countries - if we need more room in comments for all of the examples, I'll make more room.

Think we'll need it?


Saturday, October 24, 2009

Lindsay Graham Glenn Beck Rush: Angry White Guys Obama Lite: Lindsay Graham Center-Lite

Lindsay Graham must drive the good conservative people of South Carolina crazy. What do conservatives do about Lindsay Graham? He is a loose cannon bouncing around the halls of Congress, leaving the evidence of "good-ole-boys networking" on the pristine walls of conservatism. See videos below.

How do South Carolinians get him out of the Senate with the GOP funding him? I do not vote in South Carolina, but we assume, just for a minute, that conservatives there would like to replace Lindsay Graham, how does a new voice get heard? I wish I knew the answer.

I give Lindsay Graham credit in many areas. He is strong on the defense of the country and the military, he protects the rights of the unborn, he is mixed on energy, he supported Rep. Joe Wilson in a magnificent way, but he wrong on growing the Republican party. He doesn't have a clue how most conservatives think about the core of the party.

The video is Glenn Beck's latest clip and commentary of Senator Grahamnesty. Keep in mind that Graham has bashed Beck and Limbaugh on Keith Olberman. Graham just doesn't understand how a man (Beck) can make so much money for simply "crying."









Lindsay Graham Angry White Guys
 
 

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Dick Cheney Center for Security Policy Speech: Dick Cheney Keeper of the Flame Award

Here is the text of former Vice President Dick Cheney speaking to the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C. Commentary coming. Just added the video.



Dick Cheney

Pull-out quotes for a fast read. Full text and video below:
(1) Most anyone who is given responsibility in matters of national security quickly comes to appreciate the commitments and structures put in place by others who came before....And whatever course you follow, the essential thing is always to keep commitments, and to leave no doubts about the credibility of your country’s word.

(2) So among my other concerns about the drift of events under the present administration, I consider the abandonment of missile defense in Eastern Europe to be a strategic blunder and a breach of good faith.

(3) It is certainly not a model of diplomacy when the leaders of Poland and the Czech Republic are informed of such a decision at the last minute in midnight phone calls....Seventy years to the day after the Soviets invaded Poland, it was an odd way to mark the occasion [the U.S. dumping the promise of a missile shield].

(4) Only last year, the Russian Army moved into Georgia, under the orders of a man [Putin] who regards the collapse of the Soviet Union as the greatest geopolitical disaster of the 20th century. 

(5) ...President Obama’s cancellation of America’s agreements with the Polish and Czech governments was a serious blow to the hopes and aspirations of millions of Europeans. For twenty years, these peoples have done nothing but strive to move closer to us, and to gain the opportunities and security that America offered. These are faithful friends and NATO allies, and they deserve better. The impact of making two NATO allies walk the plank won’t be felt only in Europe. Our friends throughout the world are watching and wondering whether America will abandon them as well.

(6) Big events turn on the credibility of the United States – doing what we said we would do, and always defending our fundamental security interests [Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran]. 

(7) ...he [Obama] has outstretched his hand to the Islamic Republic's [Iran] authoritarian leaders, and all the while Iran has continued to provide lethal support to extremists and terrorists who are killing American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Islamic Republic continues to provide support to extremists in Syria, Lebanon, and the Palestinian territories. Meanwhile, the regime continues to spin centrifuges and test missiles. And these are just the activities we know about. 

(8) Iraq has the potential to be a strong, democratic ally in the war on terrorism, and an example of economic and democratic reform in the heart of the Middle East. 

(9) the President has been largely silent about the violent crackdown on Iran's protestors, and has moved blindly forward to engage Iran's authoritarian regime.

(10) Now suddenly – and despite our success in Iraq – we’re hearing a drumbeat of defeatism over Afghanistan. These criticisms carry the same air of hopelessness, they offer the same short-sighted arguments for walking away, and they should be summarily rejected for the same reasons of national security. 

(11) Having announced his Afghanistan strategy last March, President Obama now seems afraid to make a decision, and unable to provide his commander on the ground with the troops he needs to complete his mission. 

(12) ...signals of indecision out of Washington hurt our allies and embolden our adversaries. Waffling, while our troops on the ground face an emboldened enemy, endangers them and hurts our cause. 

(13) It’s time for President Obama to make good on his promise. The White House must stop dithering while America’s armed forces are in danger.  

Here's the quote about the Obama administration saying the Bush admin had no strategy for Afghanistan. 

(14) Recently, President Obama’s advisors have decided that it’s easier to blame the Bush Administration than support our troops. This weekend they leveled a charge that cannot go unanswered. The President’s chief of staff claimed that the Bush Administration hadn’t asked any tough questions about Afghanistan, and he complained that the Obama Administration had to start from scratch to put together a strategy.


In the fall of 2008, fully aware of the need to meet new challenges being posed by the Taliban, we dug into every aspect of Afghanistan policy, assembling a team that traveled to Pakistan and Afghanistan, reviewing options and recommendations, and briefing President-elect Obama’s team. They asked us not to announce our findings publicly, and we agreed, giving them the benefit of our work and the benefit of the doubt. The new strategy they embraced in March, with a focus on counterinsurgency and an increase in the numbers of troops, bears a striking resemblance to the strategy we passed to them. They made a decision – a good one, I think – and sent a commander into the field to implement it. 

(15) It’s time for President Obama to do what it takes to win a war he has repeatedly and rightly called a war of necessity. 

(16) When we faced that problem [captured terrorists] in the days and years after 9/11, we made some basic decisions. We understood that organized terrorism is not just a law-enforcement issue, but a strategic threat to the United States.

(17) So you would think that our successors would be going to the intelligence community saying, “How did you did you do it? What were the keys to preventing another attack over that period of time?”

Instead, they’ve chosen a different path entirely – giving in to the angry left, slandering people who did a hard job well, and demagoguing an issue more serious than any other they’ll face in these four years.
 

(18) There are policy differences, and then there are affronts that have to be answered every time without equivocation, and this is one of them. We cannot protect this country by putting politics over security, and turning the guns on our own guys.


(19)We cannot hope to win a war by talking down our country and those who do its hardest work – the men and women of our military and intelligence services. They are, after all, the true keepers of the flame.

Text From Fox News:

Thank you all very much. It’s a pleasure to be here, and especially to receive the Keeper of the Flame Award in the company of so many good friends.

I’m told that among those you’ve recognized before me was my friend Don Rumsfeld. I don’t mind that a bit. It fits something of a pattern. In a career that includes being chief of staff, congressman, and secretary of defense, I haven’t had much that Don didn’t get first. But truth be told, any award once conferred on Donald Rumsfeld carries extra luster, and I am very proud to see my name added to such a distinguished list.

To Frank Gaffney and all the supporters of Center for Security Policy, I thank you for this honor. And I thank you for the great energy and high intelligence you bring to as vital a cause as there is – the advance of freedom and the uncompromising defense of the United States.

Most anyone who is given responsibility in matters of national security quickly comes to appreciate the commitments and structures put in place by others who came before. You deploy a military force that was planned and funded by your predecessors. You inherit relationships with partners and obligations to allies that were first undertaken years and even generations earlier. With the authority you hold for a little while, you have great freedom of action. And whatever course you follow, the essential thing is always to keep commitments, and to leave no doubts about the credibility of your country’s word.

So among my other concerns about the drift of events under the present administration, I consider the abandonment of missile defense in Eastern Europe to be a strategic blunder and a breach of good faith.

It is certainly not a model of diplomacy when the leaders of Poland and the Czech Republic are informed of such a decision at the last minute in midnight phone calls. It took a long time and lot of political courage in those countries to arrange for our interceptor system in Poland and the radar system in the Czech Republic. Our Polish and Czech friends are entitled to wonder how strategic plans and promises years in the making could be dissolved, just like that – with apparently little, if any, consultation. Seventy years to the day after the Soviets invaded Poland, it was an odd way to mark the occasion.

You hardly have to go back to 1939 to understand why these countries desire – and thought they had – a close and trusting relationship with the United States. Only last year, the Russian Army moved into Georgia, under the orders of a man who regards the collapse of the Soviet Union as the greatest geopolitical disaster of the 20th century. Anybody who has spent much time in that part of the world knows what Vladimir Putin is up to. And those who try placating him, by conceding ground and accommodating his wishes, will get nothing in return but more trouble.

What did the Obama Administration get from Russia for its abandonment of Poland and the Czech Republic, and for its famous “Reset” button? Another deeply flawed election and continued Russian opposition to sanctioning Iran for its pursuit of nuclear weapons.

In the short of it, President Obama’s cancellation of America’s agreements with the Polish and Czech governments was a serious blow to the hopes and aspirations of millions of Europeans. For twenty years, these peoples have done nothing but strive to move closer to us, and to gain the opportunities and security that America offered. These are faithful friends and NATO allies, and they deserve better. The impact of making two NATO allies walk the plank won’t be felt only in Europe. Our friends throughout the world are watching and wondering whether America will abandon them as well.

Big events turn on the credibility of the United States – doing what we said we would do, and always defending our fundamental security interests. In that category belong the ongoing missions in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the need to counter the nuclear ambitions of the current regime in Iran.

Candidate Obama declared last year that he would be willing to sit down with Iran's leader without preconditions. As President, he has committed America to an Iran strategy that seems to treat engagement as an objective rather than a tactic. Time and time again, he has outstretched his hand to the Islamic Republic's authoritarian leaders, and all the while Iran has continued to provide lethal support to extremists and terrorists who are killing American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Islamic Republic continues to provide support to extremists in Syria, Lebanon, and the Palestinian territories. Meanwhile, the regime continues to spin centrifuges and test missiles. And these are just the activities we know about.

I have long been skeptical of engagement with the current regime inTehran, but even Iran experts who previously advocated for engagement have changed their tune since the rigged elections this past June and the brutal suppression of Iran's democratic protestors. The administration clearly missed an opportunity to stand with Iran's democrats, whose popular protests represent the greatest challenge to the Islamic Republic since its founding in 1979. Instead, the President has been largely silent about the violent crackdown on Iran's protestors, and has moved blindly forward to engage Iran's authoritarian regime. Unless the Islamic Republic fears real consequences from the United States and the international community, it is hard to see how diplomacy will work.

Next door in Iraq, it is vitally important that President Obama, in his rush to withdraw troops, not undermine the progress we’ve made in recent years. Prime Minister Maliki met yesterday with President Obama, who began his press availability with an extended comment about Afghanistan. When he finally got around to talking about Iraq, he told the media that he reiterated to Maliki his intention to remove all U.S. troops from Iraq. Former President
Bush's bold decision to change strategy in Iraq and surge U.S. forces there set the stage for success in that country. Iraq has the potential to be a strong, democratic ally in the war on terrorism, and an example of economic and democratic reform in the heart of the Middle East. The Obama Administration has an obligation to protect this young democracy and build on the strategic success we have achieved in Iraq.

We should all be concerned as well with the direction of policy on Afghanistan. For quite a while, the cause of our military in that country went pretty much unquestioned, even on the left. The effort was routinely praised by way of contrast to Iraq, which many wrote off as a failure until the surge proved them wrong. Now suddenly – and despite our success in Iraq – we’re hearing a drumbeat of defeatism over Afghanistan. These criticisms carry the same air of hopelessness, they offer the same short-sighted arguments for walking away, and they should be summarily rejected for the same reasons of national security.

Having announced his Afghanistan strategy last March, President Obama now seems afraid to make a decision, and unable to provide his commander on the ground with the troops he needs to complete his mission.

President Obama has said he understands the stakes for America. When he announced his new strategy he couched the need to succeed in the starkest possible terms, saying, quote, “If the Afghan government falls to the Taliban – or allows al-Qaeda to go unchallenged – that country will again be a base for terrorists who want to kill as many of our people as they possibly can.” End quote.

Five months later, in August of this year, speaking at the VFW, the President made a promise to America’s armed forces. “I will give you a clear mission,” he said, “defined goals, and the equipment and support you need to get the job done. That’s my commitment to you.”

It’s time for President Obama to make good on his promise. The White House must stop dithering while America’s armed forces are in danger. 

Make no mistake, signals of indecision out of Washington hurt our allies and embolden our adversaries. Waffling, while our troops on the ground face an emboldened enemy, endangers them and hurts our cause.

Recently, President Obama’s advisors have decided that it’s easier to blame the Bush Administration than support our troops. This weekend they leveled a charge that cannot go unanswered. The President’s chief of staff claimed that the Bush Administration hadn’t asked any tough questions about Afghanistan, and he complained that the Obama Administration had to start from scratch to put together a strategy.

In the fall of 2008, fully aware of the need to meet new challenges being posed by the Taliban, we dug into every aspect of Afghanistan policy, assembling a team that traveled to Pakistan and Afghanistan, reviewing options and recommendations, and briefing President-elect Obama’s team. They asked us not to announce our findings publicly, and we agreed, giving them the benefit of our work and the benefit of the doubt. The new strategy they embraced in March, with a focus on counterinsurgency and an increase in the numbers of troops, bears a striking resemblance to the strategy we passed to them. They made a decision – a good one, I think – and sent a commander into the field to implement it.

Now they seem to be pulling back and blaming others for their failure to implement the strategy they embraced. It’s time for President Obama to do what it takes to win a war he has repeatedly and rightly called a war of necessity.

It’s worth recalling that we were engaged in Afghanistan in the 1980’s, supporting the Mujahadeen against the Soviets. That was a successful policy, but then we pretty much put Afghanistan out of our minds. While no one was watching, what followed was a civil war, the takeover by the Taliban, and the rise of bin Laden and al-Qaeda. All of that set in motion the events of 9/11. When we deployed forces eight years ago this month, it was to make sure Afghanistan would never again be a training ground for the killing of Americans. Saving untold thousands of lives is still the business at hand in this fight. And the success of our mission in Afghanistan is not only essential, it is entirely achievable with enough troops and enough political courage.

Then there’s the matter of how to handle the terrorists we capture in this ongoing war. Some of them know things that, if shared, can save a good many innocent lives. When we faced that problem in the days and years after 9/11, we made some basic decisions. We understood that organized terrorism is not just a law-enforcement issue, but a strategic threat to the United States.

At every turn, we understood as well that the safety of the country required collecting information known only to the worst of the terrorists. We had a lot of blind spots – and that’s an awful thing, especially in wartime. With many thousands of lives potentially in the balance, we didn’t think it made sense to let the terrorists answer questions in their own good time, if they answered them at all.

The intelligence professionals who got the answers we needed from terrorists had limited time, limited options, and careful legal guidance. They got the baddest actors we picked up to reveal things they really didn’t want to share. In the case of Khalid Sheik Muhammed, by the time it was over he was not was not only talking, he was practically conducting a seminar, complete with chalkboards and charts. It turned out he had a professorial side, and our guys didn’t mind at all if classes ran long. At some point, the mastermind of 9/11 became an expansive briefer on the operations and plans of al-Qaeda. It happened in the course of enhanced interrogations. All the evidence, and common sense as well, tells us why he started to talk.

The debate over intelligence gathering in the seven years after 9/11 involves much more than historical accuracy. What we’re really debating are the means and resolve to protect this country over the next few years, and long after that. Terrorists and their state sponsors must be held accountable, and America must remain on the offensive against them. We got it right after 9/11. And our government needs to keep getting it right, year after year, president after president, until the danger is finally overcome.

Our administration always faced its share of criticism, and from some quarters it was always intense. That was especially so in the later years of our term, when the dangers were as serious as ever, but the sense of general alarm after 9/11 was a fading memory. Part of our responsibility, as we saw it, was not to forget the terrible harm that had been done to America … and not to let 9/11 become the prelude to something much bigger and far worse.

Eight years into the effort, one thing we know is that the enemy has spent most of this time on the defensive – and every attempt to strike inside the United States has failed. So you would think that our successors would be going to the intelligence community saying, “How did you did you do it? What were the keys to preventing another attack over that period of time?”

Instead, they’ve chosen a different path entirely – giving in to the angry left, slandering people who did a hard job well, and demagoguing an issue more serious than any other they’ll face in these four years. No one knows just where that path will lead, but I can promise you this: There will always be plenty of us willing to stand up for the policies and the people that have kept this country safe.

On the political left, it will still be asserted that tough interrogations did no good, because this is an article of faith for them, and actual evidence is unwelcome and disregarded. President Obama himself has ruled these methods out, and when he last addressed the subject he filled the air with vague and useless platitudes. His preferred device is to suggest that we could have gotten the same information by other means. We’re invited to think so. But this ignores the hard, inconvenient truth that we did try other means and techniques to elicit information from Khalid Sheikh Muhammed and other al-Qaeda operatives, only turning to enhanced techniques when we failed to produce the actionable intelligence we knew they were withholding. In fact, our intelligence professionals, in urgent circumstances with the highest of stakes, obtained specific information, prevented specific attacks, and saved American lives.

In short, to call enhanced interrogation a program of torture is not only to disregard the program’s legal underpinnings and safeguards. Such accusations are a libel against dedicated professionals who acted honorably and well, in our country’s name and in our country’s cause. What’s more, to completely rule out enhanced interrogation in the future, in favor of half-measures, is unwise in the extreme. In the fight against terrorism, there is no middle ground, and half-measures keep you half exposed.

For all that we’ve lost in this conflict, the United States has never lost its moral bearings – and least of all can that be said of our armed forces and intelligence personnel. They have done right, they have made our country safer, and a lot of Americans are alive today because of them.

Last January 20th, our successors in office were given the highest honors that the voters of this country can give any two citizens. Along with that, George W. Bush and I handed the new president and vice president both a record of success in the war on terror, and the policies to continue that record and ultimately prevail. We had been the decision makers, but those seven years, four months, and nine days without another 9/11 or worse, were a combined achievement: a credit to all who serve in the defense of America, including some of the finest people I’ve ever met.

What the present administration does with those policies is their call to make, and will become a measure of their own record. But I will tell you straight that I am not encouraged when intelligence officers who acted in the service of this country find themselves hounded with a zeal that should be reserved for America’s enemies. And it certainly is not a good sign when the Justice Department is set on a political mission to discredit, disbar, or otherwise persecute the very people who helped protect our nation in the years after 9/11.

There are policy differences, and then there are affronts that have to be answered every time without equivocation, and this is one of them. We cannot protect this country by putting politics over security, and turning the guns on our own guys.

We cannot hope to win a war by talking down our country and those who do its hardest work – the men and women of our military and intelligence services. They are, after all, the true keepers of the flame.

Thank you very much.

Thanks again to Fox News for providing the text of this sobering message.




Dick Cheney - Center for Security Policy Speech

©2007-2012copyrightMaggie M. Thornton