The New Deceptive Spin at the U.N.: Re-tooling Racism

The United Nations has re-tooled the word "racism" and replaced it with the epigrammatical: "contemporary racism". Under the guise of "contemporary racism," the U.N.'s Human Rights Council is taking care of its darling, Islam, and why not, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) runs things there in The Council. Resolution 2002/9 mentions "fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion...," but it does not mention any religion by name except Islam. Within Islam, there is always distinction as to sex and other religions. Nowhere in this Resolution does it mention the rapes in Darfur, the beheadings in Iraq, Iran's chant to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, or honor killings here in the U.S. within Muslim families. Here are quotes from the Resolution:

Alarmed at the impact of the events of 11 September 2001 on Muslim minorities and communities in some non-Muslim countries and the negative projection of Islam, Muslim values and traditions by the media, as well as at the introduction and enforcement of laws that specifically discriminate against and target Muslims, Also expresses deep concern that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and with terrorism; Notes with concern the intensification of the campaign of defamation of religions, and the ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities, in the aftermath of the tragic events of 11 September 2001; Expresses its concern at any role in which the print, audio-visual or electronic media or any other means are used to incite acts of violence, xenophobia or related intolerance and discrimination towards Islam and any other religion;

The Bush administration is fighting this effort to hush us, and they have done so before and failed. Islam dominates. The Washington Times quotes U.S. officials, "under the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the topic:"

...they hope to persuade moderate Muslim nations - among them Senegal, Mali, Nigeria and Indonesia - to reject the measure, which lacks the force of law but has provided diplomatic cover for regimes that repress critical speech.

Sources referred to as "religious rights groups" say that much of the language within other U.N. "measures, including statements...replicate the language of the resolution:"

Now we are seeing a clear attempt by OIC countries to mainstream the concept and insert it into just about every other topic they can," Miss Gaer said. "They are turning freedom of expression into restriction of expression.

This Resolution is renewed each year. Each year the West votes against it. Each year, the West loses.

*****

U.N. Human Rights Council Considers Religious Defamation Ban by Holger Awakens

So, what in the world does a United Nations Human Rights Council's " religious defamation resolution" mean, exactly? Let's look at how it is described here at One News Now:

The United Nations' Human Rights Council has launched a new session and will consider a controversial resolution to declare religious defamation illegal. The resolution is really designed to permit countries with a dominant religion, such as Islam, to squelch any free-speech rights of religious minorities, according to Bill Saunders of the Family Research Council (FRC). "So for instance, in some Muslim countries, it's considered blasphemy to just say what a Christian believes -- because that is inconsistent with what Islam teaches," Saunders explains. "Or, to try to switch from Islam to Christianity, that's considered apostasy, and in those situations you can be punished by death."

Got that? What this means is that if the U.N. resolution passes and then is passed by the U.N. General Assembly, it will be ILLEGAL to practice any other religion in an islamic country other than Islam. So, if you are a Christian in Saudi Arabia, you would not be able to legally practice your religion, speak about your religion, or gather to hold worship - even in a room in your house. This isn't just a matter of freedom of religion...it is that of free speech. As far as I know, this resolution is unprecedented in the arena of international government. More from the article:

The Human rights Council is dominated by Muslim countries. The resolution is also expected to be submitted to the United Nations General Assembly. "The idea that free speech should be so restricted is a very dangerous one," Saunders adds.

I have spoken here at Holger Awakens for a very long time how world domination is the goal of Islam and that in fact, Islam is simply NOT a religion. It is a violent political ideology and if you read the Qur'an, it is plain to see that world domination is as important in this ideology as is any entrace to a spiritual afterlife. The vast majority of those representatives on this farce of an international body, called the U.N. Human Rights Council, are from islamic countries. They have pushed the envelope before and this will be just another example of that. All this does is seek to legitimize, in the eyes of the world, the punishments the islamists can dole out for those who don't kneel and submit to allah. Bottom line is this...if you live in a islam-dominated country, you had better decide to worship the likes of the pedophile prophet Mohammed or you will end up in prison or hanging from the end of a rope dangling from a crane. Now, I'm sure the Human Rights Council will make some sort of exception to this resolution so a Christian-dominated America could not make the worship of islam in America illegal. It will be interesting to see how they work around that possible angle. But as is always the case, the United Nations has put up another example of how literally corrupt that organization is - with hundreds of countries in this world still violating the human rights of individuals, this Council has nothing else to do but make sure all of their islamic terrorist friends have a further weapon to persecute religious freedom in their homelands. This is the year 2008 folks, and we are seeing the highest international governing body in the entire world considering a resolution that would reflect the conditions in the Middle Ages. Unbelievable.

Islam still seeking religious domination The United Nations' Human Rights Council has launched a new session and will consider a controversial resolution to declare religious defamation illegal. The resolution is really designed to permit countries with a dominant religion, such as Islam, to squelch any free-speech rights of religious minorities, according to Bill Saunders of the Family Research Council (FRC). "So for instance, in some Muslim countries, it's considered blasphemy to just say what a Christian believes -- because that is inconsistent with what Islam teaches," Saunders explains. "Or, to try to switch from Islam to Christianity, that's considered apostasy, and in those situations you can be punished by death." It is debatable whether a voice for religious freedom will be heard. "Rightly so, the world objects to that kind of thing and says to these countries [that] we need to have religious freedom," Saunders contends. "And religious freedom includes the right to have any religion that you choose and to follow it." The Human rights Council is dominated by Muslim countries. The resolution is also expected to be submitted to the United Nations General Assembly. "The idea that free speech should be so restricted is a very dangerous one," Saunders adds.

End Article.