Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) listed an astounding number of violations of Federal law committed by Obama's Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan. I am at a loss to understand how Democrats will find this woman, who has spent her professional life in activism, with complete disdain for the U.S. Constitution, qualified for this life-time position. The fact that she will end up on the Supreme Court and my children and grandchildren will live with her lack of integrity and contempt for the Rule of Law is heartbreaking. See the video below.
Here are a few of Sessions comments (paraphrased):
Kagan has less real legal experience of any nominee in at least 50 years.
Not only has she not been a judge, she has barely practiced law, and not with the intensity and duration that I think real legal understanding occurs.
Kagan has never tried a case before a jury
She argued her first appellate case just 9 months ago. There is no substitute of being in the harness of the law, handling real cases over a period of law.
Kagan has spent her career in policy and politics, mixed with law.
Her college thesis, Socialism in New York, bemoan socialism's demise.
Her Master's thesis noted the activist tendencies of the Earl Warren court - but said it could have done a better job justifying their activism.
Kagan left law for 5 years for politics.
Kagan was central figure in the White House Clinton-Gore effort to restrict gun rights.
She was the point person for the Clinton Administration effort to block Congressional restriction on partial birth abortions - the key person to convince Clinton to change his mind from supporting restrictions to opposing legislation that would ban it.
While at Harvarvd as the Dean, she reversed existing policy, and kicked military out of recruiting offices in violation of federal law. She punished our Military and demeaned our soldiers as they fought in two wars overseas.
Kagan joined 3 other law school Deans to write a letter in response to Senator Grahams legislation to establish procedures to determine who was an enemy combatant in the war on terror. She compared this legislation, which passed 84 to 14 as fundamentally the same as the lawless actions of a dictatorship. Gr
As Solicitor General for 1 year, her short tenure was not without controversy. In her first appellate argument that speech and press guarantees of First Amendment would allow Federal Gov't to ban publications and pamphlets discussing political issues before an election. [Session reminds her of Thomas Paines Common Sense]
As Solicitor General, Kagan approved filing of a brief to SCOTUS asking that it strike down provisions of the legal Arizona Workers Act which suspends or revokes the businesses licenses of corporations which knowingly hire illegal aliens, even though Federal law expressly prohibits such hiring. She did this even after the liberal 9th Circuit upheld the law.
There is much more. I hope you will listen to the video. If you believe Kagan should be confirmed, please ask yourself why you want a judge who will attempt to change, at least the First and Second Amendments, refuse to define an enemy combatant and abort late-term babies?