U.N. Human Rights Council "Crucifies" Islam

Islamic members of the United Nations Human Rights Council are attempting to shield Islamic Shari'a law abuses from any discussion within the Council. Should the HR Council want to discuss female genital mutilation, the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) wants it forbidden. Should any violence against anyone at the behest of Shari'a law be introduced on the floor of the Council, Islamic HR members want it deleted from the record. The following is from U.N. Watch and a transcript from the June 16, 2008 HR Council general debate:

It all started when the heroic David Littman, undaunted by malicious attempts to expel him from the UN, tried to deliver a speech on violence against women and what Islamic scholars can do to prevent it. The Egyptian representative interrupted repeatedly and challenged the council president. “Regardless of the result of the vote — I couldn’t care less if I will win or lose this vote — my point is that Islam will not be crucified in this council!”

The president gave in: “Statements should refrain from making judgments or evaluations of a particular religion. . . I can promise that at the next evaluation of a religious creed, law, or document, I will interrupt the speaker and we’ll go on to the next one.”

David Littman, an historian, was at the Human Rights Council to read a joint statement of the Association for World Education, International Humanist and Ethical Union. After 4-1/2 lines into the statement, Egypt objected and the Council President Costea (Bogata) seemed to uphold Egypt's stance and called on Pakistan. Pakistan, however, wasn't finished with it:

There is an agenda behind it, and you have already given a ruling on the discussion of Shari’a law in this council. We have strong objections on any discussion, any direct or indirect discussion, any out of context, selective discussion on the Shari’a law in this council.

After statements from Canada and Slovenia, President Costea calls for a 45 minute break. He returned and allowed Littman to proceed:

Regarding FGM, our detailed written statement discusses the reasons why 96 percent of Egyptian women are still subjected to FGM despite state legislation in 1997 outlawing the practice. “Almost 90 percent of the female population in the north of Sudan undergo FGM which in many cases is practiced in its most extreme form known as infibulation” — we are quoting from a report by the special rapporteur Halima Warzazi. UNICEF figures indicate that over 3 million young girls are mutilated each year in 32 countries, 29 of which are member states of the OIC. We believe that only a fatwa from Al-Azhar Grand Sheikh Sayyid Tantawy replacing the ambiguous fatwas of 1949, 1959 and 1981 will change this barbaric criminal practice, which is now growing even in Europe.

Egypt objected again:

...This is an attempt to link bad traditional practices to Islam. Sheikh Al-Azhar is the president of the largest and the biggest and the oldest Islamic university in the world.

Egypt challengesd the President's ruling to allow Littman to speak and puts this on the record:

...regardless of the result of the vote, I couldn’t care less if I will win or lose this vote, my point is that Islam will not be crucified in this council! That’s why we are challenging your ruling and the result of the vote will be indicative to what all... delegations think on this issue. And it will be a matter of discussion later of the OIC [Organization of the Islamic Conference]...

The President called for another short break then repeats:

I said that statements should refrain from making judgments or evaluations of a particular religion. We’ve just heard that a certain act which is a fatwa is considered ambiguous. This is a judgment, this is an evaluation.

Germany objected to Egypt's "Islam will not be crucified in this council" remark and seems to indicate that such a statement is not "appropriate." President Costea advised everyone to "take a deep breath." Egypt requested the Council to:

...delete any reference to the fatwa by Sheikh Al-Azhar — to delete all reference to Sheikh Al-Azhar from this paragraph in the official records of the meeting.

David Littman received a "caution" and was allowed to speak again:

The government of Pakistan vigorously condemns the practice of so-called honour killings, and that such actions do not find any place in our religion or law.” This is a quotation from President Musharaf on the 28th of April 2000, yet this murderous practice seems to be on the increase in Pakistan and elsewhere. Even in Europe in certain communities. It must be criminalized and the law strictly applied.

The stoning of women for alleged adultery still occurs regularly in Iran, Sudan, and other countries. In Iran, they are buried up to their waists in pits, and blunt stones are used thereby increasing their agony in death. The marriage age for girls in Iran remains at 9 years old. In the year 2000 the Iranian parliament attempted to increase the age to 14 but the law was overturned by the Council of Guardians. Last week…

Iran objected and is given the floor:

Mr. President, the statement and the references made by the speaker in this statement is false and has nothing to do with the realities in my country. I just wanted for the record to say that. “The stoning of women occurs regularly in Iran” — that’s not true. It’s completely false and out of question.

Cuba and Slovenia gave short statements, it seems in support of President Costea, who gave the nod to Littman again:

Integrating the human rights of women throughout the United Nations System is part of Item 8, under paragraph 140. I will conclude, sir. Last week, Noble Peace Prize laureate, Shirin Ebadi, speaking in Geneva, denounced the fact that in Iran, a girl is considered an adult and liable to punishment, even execution, at 9, and a boy, at 15. She rejects the concept of cultural relativism, as does the French Secretary of State for Urban Affairs, Fadela Amara, who recently strongly criticized the ruling of a French judge in Lille for annulling a marriage between 2 Muslims because the girl lied about her virginity in the marriage contract. Mrs. Amara rightly called this aberration, and I quote, “A real fatwa against the emancipation and liberty of women.” [President bangs gavel.] Thank you, Mr. President, I was quoting a Minister in France, sir.

Costea banged his gavel, declared that time was up and the Council disband until the next day's session. Related: U.N. Weakens Freedom of Expression to Coddle Islam Rape in War: Will the U.N. Walk its Talk? Permalink: http://maggiesnotebook.blogspot.com/2008/07/un-human-rights-council-crucifies-islam.html Trackback URL for this entry: http://haloscan.com/tb/maggiesnotebook/7667120890298478255 Technorati Tags: U.N., U.N.,United Nations, Human Rights Council, Organization of the Islamic, Anne Bayerfsky, Eye on the UN,UN Watch, Reject the UN

U.N. Human Rights Council Kicks-Up Its Policy of Abuse

One of the most important issues of our time is America's membership in the United Nations.

If you take comfort in the existence of the UN's Human Rights Council, or any confidence that world human rights are protected by this Council, then you are deaf, dumb and blind, or you hate freedom.

Lorn Gunter at the Calgary Herald has put together a very important piece about the U.N.'s Human Rights Council. Gunter states the central issue:

The fascinating aspect for me is how many of Freedom House's "worst of the worst list" ["worst" human rights record] have also been elected by the UN to be voting members on its human rights council.

The U.N.'s inhumanity to man, woman and child goes on:

On May 21, 15 of the 47 UNHRC seats will come up for election or re-election. Along with UN Watch, an organization that analyzes UN activities, statements and programs, Freedom House has declared that five of the 15 candidate countries -- Bahrain, Gabon, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zambia -- are entirely unfit for membership because of their rights records. All but one of them (Bahrain) is already a member of the commission. This goes to show how useless the UN is at protecting human rights.

Please read this important piece at The Calgary Herald

Related Reading:
UN Weakens Freedom of Expression to Coddle Islam
United Nations Seals the Condemnation of Israel
UN Watch: Up Against UN Human Rights

Posted by Maggie

Technorati Tags: U.N., U.N. Human Rights Council, Human Rights

UN Weakens Freedom of Expression to Coddle Islam

This is how we protect the human rights of Muslims from themselves

The United Nations Human Rights Council has been busy protecting the rights of religion...well, not religion - just Islam.

Muslims furious over everything, but especially the 2007 cartoon publications in a Danish newspaper of Prophet Muhammad, galvanized the Islamic countries within the Council to muscle through a resolution opposed by most non-Muslim countries.

According to the International Herald Tribune: This is

There are 17 Muslim countries in the 47-nation human rights council. Their alliance with China, Cuba, Russia and most of the African members means they can almost always achieve a majority.

Human Rights Watch said the resolution could endanger the basic rights of individuals.

The initial resolution was a "mandate renewal" and was sponsored and co-sponsored by over 50 countries, including Canada, Uganda, The U.S., France, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Germany, the U.K. and Australia.

China and Pakistan, however, manuevering on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, Egypt, Algeria, South Africa, Belarus and the Cuban delegation, insisted on a weakened [restricted] freedom of expression resolution. They won. The "West" lost.

UN Watch reports that "Western states agreed to add a preambular paragraph:

Mindful also that article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights provides that exercize of the right to freedom of expression carries with it special duties and responsibilities and may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but that these shall be only such as are provided by law and are necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, or for the protection of national security or of public order, or public health and morals, and that article 20 provides that any propaganda for war or advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.

A question: If the above is prohibited by law - whose law and how is such a law enforced?

Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism - or any other religion - are not mentioned - only Islam.

Article 19 reports that they, in conjunction with the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS) "condemns the resolution," and they point to the fact that the UN Human Rights Council spreads their hearings over several weeks - making it difficult for "most civil society organisations" to sustain effective advocacy and lobbying strategy...."

Iran is a member of The UN Human Rights Council. In 2007, the Council dropped Cuba and Belarus from their blacklist of human rights abusers, BUT at the same time, blatantly targeted Israel for "permanent indictment under a special agenda item." The details of this condemnation are astounding. You can read it United Nations Seals the Condemnation of Israel.

At the same link, Anne Bayerfsky, writing for the Wall Street Journal and Eye on the UN:

The political lesson here is that the U.S. and Canada don't have the power to push the council to protect human rights, and the European Union would rather sacrifice Israel and hide its own weakness by joining the consensus.

And...

Israel holds the distinction of being the only country on the planet that the U.N. deems a human rights abuser:...not genocide in Sudan, not child slavery in China, nor the persecution of democracy dissidents in Egypt and elsewhere.

So, the UN sees it as their mission to place the religious rights of some [Islam] above the religious rights of all others, and definitely above your individual rights.

Cross-posted at Reject the UN

Tracked by:
Rosemary's Thoughts - Need tech help Excerpt: I'm using IE 6 on an XP, and I'm not able to go to some sites that I used to be able to read. I did something in Tools, Internet Options, Advanced. I do not remember the changes I made, but I went there after this problem occurred. I'm so screwed .....


Technorati Tags:U.N., U.N.,United Nations, Human Rights Council, Organization of the Islamic, Anne Bayerfsky, Eye on the UN,UN Watch, Reject the UN