Quantcast

Pages

Showing posts with label Charlie Crist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charlie Crist. Show all posts

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Crist Accuses Rubio of Turning His Back on Family Video

Charlie Crist gives Goofy a bad name. Marco Rubio is an American with Cuban-American parents. Rubio's father recently passed away. Rubio is the Republican nominee for a Florida Senate Seat, and Goofy Charlie Crist the Independent candidate for the same seat.


Marco Rubio
From HotAir:
How do we know Charlie Crist has fully transformed into a Democrat? He set himself up as the authority on Hispanic authenticity in the debate with Marco Rubio and Kendrick Meek last night on the Tampa Bay Fox affiliate. In fact, Crist goes so far that the other Democrat in the race winds up objecting to the attack after Marco Rubio’s strong rebuttal. Crist attempts to scold Rubio for “turning his back on his Hispanic family,” and then tries to weasel out of it by saying he just read it in a newspaper:
It’s bad enough playing identity politics when one is of the identity in question. It’s doubly offensive when it comes from someone who shares nothing of the ethnicity they purport to represent.
Isn’t Crist the candidate that just “turned his back” on the political party he led in this state only because Rubio was kicking his rear end in primary polling, and then spent the next several months reversing almost every policy position he ever held? Crist has the nerve to lecture Rubio on political ambition?


Charlie Crist and Marco Rubio on Being Hispanic or Not (video)

Posted by Maggie @ Maggie's Notebook

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Charlie Crist's Bad Pitch at Tampa Bay Rays and What's Up With Those Pants?

Florida governor for just a few more days, Charlie Crist, threw out a pitch at the Tampa Bay Rays. How embarrassing, and what's up with those pants?




Charlie Crist at Tampa Bay Rays (video)


Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Mark Turner Correspondance with Governor Charlie Crist

As many of you may know, I've been off the computer for about two weeks due to extreme eye strain. Since that time, my blogging friend Mark Turner has been moved from a hospital to a jail facility and then on September 28th to a prison at Lake Butler in Chipley, Florida. According to Mark's wife, he will stay at the Lake Butler facility for an unspecified time while he is "acclimated to prison." Find links to the background on Mark at the end of this article.

Mark Turner

In the meantime, I have received from a close of friend of Mark, a copy of what his friends and I have referred to as "Mark's book." The "book" has been used on numerous occasions, and particularly as documentation for Florida Governor, Charlie Crist.

In one of Mark's conversations with Crist's impotent office on November 5, 2009, he was advised to get a "complaint form" from the Ecambia (Florida) County Sheriff's office (ECSO). After doing so, Mark notified Dustin Fusillo in Crist's office that he was concerned about the "Disclaimer" printed on the complaint form:
Any Person who is a participant in an internal investigation, including the complainant...who willfully discloses any information...not limited to the identy of the officer under investigation...before such complaint becomes a public record, commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in S.775.082 or 775.083. "Florida Statute 112.538 (Penalty: up to 1 year in jail and/or up to $1000 fine."
So imagine that you are being wrongfully sued by a state prosecutor or have been wrongfully convicted at the behest of your state's prosecutor, and you appeal to your Governor's office for help. The Governor's office advises you to obtain a complaint form from your country Sheriff's office and to execute that complaint form. Then imagine that doing so means a certain prison sentence. From Mark's letter to Crist:
There is more to the Disclaimer that threatens and concerns me but as you can read, by me signing the Complaint Form, I am guaranteed a free ride to prison. Remember, they arrested me because I civilly sued Pete Moore of Pete Moore Chevrolet for $36 Million. This civil lawsuit is WHY I was arrested. Therefore I am awaiting your written response before I sign and sent the complaint form. 
What would you do? What could you do? Mark ended his letter to Charlie Crist with this:
I am requesting an Executive Investigation into the offices held by those mentioned above. If this evidence I provide is not significant enough for an investigation, how many people do I need to come forward to launch one? I have them lined u because of my website www.markturnedandfriends.com. If you Google: Mark Turner and any of the above mentioned people, you will see that I have the support. Governor Crist, the State Attorney's Office offered me as little as 10 months with no restitution or face 90 years. I have included this document as well. Am I that big a threat, or that little a threat?  (signed Sincerely, Mark Turner).
Needless to say no "Executive Investigation" was launched, even though Mark provided a wealth of documentation to Crist's office.

For background on Mark Turner's (of Pensacola, Florida) criminal lawsuit, please go here: Mark Turner, The Short and Important Story. See two current videos made by Mark in my left sidebar.

Posted by Maggie @ Maggie's Notebook

Friday, April 30, 2010

Jeb Bush: Crist Decision Not About Principle or Policy: Charlie Crist as Disingenuous as EVAH

Crist was never one to demigogue, he says, right after he thanks his "God." Crist believes he is the people's choice and that is why he is switching parties to be an Independent - from the Republican party that was just swell not too long ago.  Saying he will be with "you," - his supporters for EVAH, we see that whatever the issue might be, Crist will jump the fence to do it, if it will further his career. And by the way, he is talking to his "Father" much more these days, he said - and he didn't mean his biological father.

After Crist's announcement that he was moving to the Independent Party, his predecessor, Jeb Bush said this:

I am not surprised. This decision is not about policy or principles. It is about what he believes is his political self-interest.
Harsh, harsh...good for Jeb speaking truth to power.

About those Republicans who supported him when he was a Republican,  but now want their money back, The Lonely Conservative says Crist is offering "pro-rated refunds." How about the money the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) gave him after jumping-the-gun and endorsing him immediately?  Perhaps they'll get the message when their donations dry up.





Charlie Crist on Becoming an Independent

Others Talking:
Hot Air

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Marco Rubio, Republicans Probed by Feds in Florida

The Republican party in Florida is under examination by the Feds, but Governor Charlie Crist is not a part of the probe. Crist's challenger for the state's U.S. Senate seat is named in the investigation. American Express credit cards were allegedly given to elected Florida officials and staff by the GOP.

Florida Governor Charlie Crist is not named in this Miami Herald article. Either he did not receive a card, or is exempt from the investigation.

Rubio billed the party for more than $100,000 during the two years he served as House speaker, according to credit statements obtained by the Miami Herald and St. Petersburg Times. The charges included repairs to the family minivan, grocery bills, plane tickets for his wife, and purchases from retailers ranging from a wine store near his home to apple's on-line store. Rubio also charged the party for dozens of meals during the annual lawmaking session in Tallahassee, even though he received taxpayer subsidies for his meals.

Rubio said the billings all related to party business -- the minivan, for example, was damaged by a valet at a political function -- and that he repaid the party for about $16,000 in personal expenses.
 Petulant waffler RINO, Charlie Crist apparently asked the Feds to open the probe into his own party, including investigation into his own handpicked chairman, Jim Greer.

Friday, April 16, 2010

Charlie Crist Jeb Bush Blackmail? Connie Mack Stands on Principle Dumps Crist

Charlie Crist may have tried to politically blackmail Jeb Bush's wallet, but like everything else Crist tries to do these days, it didn't work. In the same fallout, Crist's political mentor, former Senator Connie Mack (R-FL) resigned as Crist's campaign manager. Both Bush and Mack supported the education reform bill passed by the Florida legislature. Crist supported it before he didn't. Now he has vetoed the bill and is becoming a party-of-one.

Charlie Crist                          Jeb Bush

Crist wouldn't recognize 'principle' if it was tri-colored and perched on his desk corner. The Florida State Legislature just passed a school reform bill that ends teacher tenure and begins a program of 'merit pay' for achievement. Crist has said no other issue has put as much pressure on him as this bill. Governor Crist has vetoed his own party's bill.

His campaign manager, former senator, Connie Mack, resigned his position after Crist's veto, saying the veto was "unsupportable and wrong."
Following Mack's resignation as Crist's campaign chair, Republican endorsers from inside the state government have also begun to drop off the Crist bandwagon, leaving Crist increasingly isolated in his GOP Senate primary fight with Marco Rubio.

 Connie Mack                  Marco Rubio

Note to RINO National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) "picker," Senator John Cornyn - you can safely drop your Committee's support of Crist now, dontcha know? Move our monies and support to Marco Rubio. Senator John Cornyn says he is "honor-bound" to continue backing Crist. Well, I don't think so.

Former Florida Governor, Jeb Bush supported the education reform bill. He has not endorsed his successor, Charlie Crist. Maybe Charlie thought by waiting to the very, very last minute to veto or sign, Bush might endorse him in exchange for his signature. Didn't happen. Political blackmail didn't work.

Teachers and their unions do not like the bill. Crist's own father was a school administrator and he has sisters that were public school teachers. Is it such a radical idea that teachers be rewarded for their successes? A union environment, or a government worker doesn't understand that theory, but the rest of us do.
"My dad used to be chairman of the school board," said Crist, who was once the education commissioner. "Two of my three sisters have been public school teachers . . . I am hearing a lot about it everywhere. They're making very good suggestions from the heart."
According to this, Crist says Jeb Bush left a voicemail for Crist:
"He encouraged me to sign the bill," Crist said. "Shocking. God bless him."
How dismissive and patronizing is that?

Crist seems to think it's good politics to hint that Bush is trying to feather his own nest through his foundation for educational policy reform, the Bush Foundation for Florida's Future. Crist wants us to believe this is about padding Jeb Bush's wallet. What if it's about children learning more?

I doubt there is a single school district believing they have adequate funding for their school district. It never ends. It is never enough. I stumped my neighborhood streets to raise money for schools - years of doing so, bond issues, fundraisers...it is never enough.

Maybe Jeb can and will publicly endorse Marco Rubio now (his son Jeb has already done so). Maybe U.S. Rep. Tom Rooney (R-FL), whose alleged mentor is said to be Connie Mack, will now endorse Marco Rubio. Mack has to vote for someone. Will he endorse Rubio?

Related and Background:
Anointing Charlie Crist, Dismissing Marco Rubio 

Marco Rubio Challenges Charlie Crist

Marco Rubio CPAC Speech 2010 Transcript

Marco Rubio Gets Rudy Giuliani Endorsement

Did You Hear What charlie Crist Said Today?


Saturday, April 10, 2010

John Cornyn Still Supports Charlie Crist: Marco Rubio Out Raises Crist $3.6M to $1.1M:

Marco Rubio out-raised Charlie Crist in the first quarter of 2010 by $2.5 million. Crist began his fundraising efforts in the second quarter of 2009 raising $4.4 million. It was downhill from there. In the third quarter Crist brought in only half of the previous quarter - $2.5 million. By the fourth quarter, Rubio was close, raising $1.76 million to to Crist's $2.1 million. By the end of March 2010 Rubio's coffers were plush with $3.6 million to Crist's $1.1 million. But it makes no difference that Floridians can clearly distinguish a Conservative from a RINO - Senator John Cornyn and his committee of "Senatorial pickers" still support Crist.

Marco Rubio
Once again, can't help but think how misguided the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) can be, as they endorsed Crist practically before he was even running, and unfortunately continue to follow the error of their ways. NRSC chairman, Sen. John Cornyn said he is "honor-bound to leave it as it is." So Rubio joins other worthy and conservative candidates without support from their own Party.

From The Daily Caller:
Last Spring, the NRSC threw its support behind Crist...Cornyn defended the endorsement as "selfish." After meeting with former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who opted out of running for the seat, he said Crist was seen as "the ideal candidate" because he's a good fundraiser."
Florida Republicans passed controversial education reform which ends teacher tenure, and will pay teachers according to the achievement of their students - known as "merit pay."  Florida teachers are not happy about it and they are pressuring Crist to veto the bill. Crist said no other issue has put as much pressure on him as this bill, passed by his own party. Early-on he supported the bill. Now he's not sure. He has to make a decision by Friday April 16th.

Crist said one of the most important things a public servant can do is "listen." He is listening, he says. The question is always, to whom are you listening? The people who want to clean up the schools, and want their children to learn, or the powerful Teacher's Union?

Jeb Bush has endorsed Marco Rubio "kinda-sorta." Some are theorizing that if Jeb comes out and publicly endorses Crist, Crist will let the bill pass. If not, then he vetoes the bill. This is a stellar reminder of why we do not want Floridians to send Charlie Crist to the U.S. Senate. His vote is always up for sale.

Rubio still trails Crist in total fundraising some $6.9 million to $10.1 million, so keep the funds rolling-in to Rubio.  He will need it as we draw nearer to November. For some biographical background on Rubio, read this.




Saturday, April 3, 2010

Marco Rubio Gets Rudy Giuliani Endorsement - Disses Crist?

Former New York mayor, Rudy Giuliani is endorsing Marco Rubio's candidacy for the U.S. Senate from Florida. Hot Air is speculating about Giuliani - considered a social Liberal and fiscal Conservative, and why he is not endorsing sitting Florida governor, Charlie Crist.

Marco Rubio

The most obvious answer is it's payback time. Crist endorsed Senator John McCain in the 2008 presidential election, even though Giuliani asked the Governor for his support.

I think there is more to it than that, and my theory goes to Republican endorsements across the map. For example, we hear that Marco Rubio, now considered a true Conservative, has been not so Conservative at times when he served in the Florida State House of Representatives, including his time as Speaker of the House.

We are in a new day, and some Moderates are not averse to recognizing that straddling the line helps drive up the debt.  Conservatives like Rubio are 'getting the Constitution.' Fiscal Conservatism and Traditional Values are the yardstick by which all will be measured. In fact, I think some Moderates are now 'true believers' and I think Rubio is one of those. Rudy could come close, even though revenge is sweet today for him as he refuses to endorse Charlie Crist, who everyone thought was shoo-in for the Senate.

When in our history, since Reagan, have we talked about Fiscal Conservatism? We haven't. Now it is the talk of the day - and We the People are fueling the talk. Conservatives no longer believe they have to give away the farm for a vote.

Public awareness and the Tea Party movement is giving backbone to our politicians, and most importantly, we are  shining a bright light on our forgotten U.S. Constitution. Republicans and former Moderates are doing it, while Democrats continue to hold the Constitution in disdain. 'We the People' 'get it.' The most important factor in Conservatism is the Constitution, which if adhered to, will create Fiscal Conservatism.

We now have the proper awareness that our Founding documents are the spine and backbone of this country. And Moderates are finding that they like it as much as we do. So, when a former RINO begins to 'get it,' let's welcome them to the club. We will not move Rudy off of some of his social issues, but through his endorsement of Marco Rubio, he has somewhat shed his RINO skin.  It is a new day. People change. People become believers. If Conservatism reigns, freedom rings!


Thursday, April 1, 2010

Candidate Info

Scroll down for states listed alphabetically
As of April 16th, I have just begun this database and will be adding to it daily.


This database has been replaced. Please go here.

Florida Elections November 2010

Incumbent Rep. Tom Rooney Serving Florida's 16th District

Brian Reilly Florida Republican US House Candidate - District 20

Charlie Crist Jeb Bush Blackmail? Connie Mack Stands on Principle Dumps Crist

Anointing Charlie Crist, Dismissing Marco Rubio 

Marco Rubio Challenges Charlie Crist

Marco Rubio CPAC Speech 2010 Transcript

Marco Rubio Gets Rudy Giuliani Endorsement

Did You Hear What Charlie Crist Said Today?

Nevada Elections November 2010
Harry Reid Trails Sue Lowden - Reid Needs Crossover Republicans and Independents

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Marco Rubio CPAC Speech 2010 Transcript

Marco Rubio, the come-from-behind candidate for Florida's senate seat against sitting governor, Charlie Crist, addressed the 2010 CPAC convention on February 17th. The transcript follows:


Marco Rubio

Thank you so much. Thank you. I really appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you, Senator DeMint, who believed in me when, really, the only people -- most of the people that believed in me lived in my house. And thank you to CPAC. I'm really honored that you have me here today in Washington.

You know, a week ago we didn't know we were going to make it here. We were watching the -- all the images of that winter weather, the extraordinary blizzard that even impacted government. I don't know if you know this, but the Congress couldn't meet to vote on bills. The regulatory agencies couldn't meet to set any regulations, either. And the president couldn't find anywhere to set up a teleprompter to announce new taxes.

You know, now that I come to think of it, the blizzard may be the best thing to happen to the American economy in 12 months.
I also want to take a moment and recognize all of you folks that came up from Florida that are here today. I know I saw some of the Young Republicans from the University of Central Florida here, and I wanted to recognize them. Thank you.
And finally, my wife was able to join us here today. See -- I told you people really come to my speeches.
You know, as I reflect on this campaign, not to mention all the opportunities that I've had in my life, it often reminds me of my grandfather. My grandfather was an enormous influence on me growing up. He was born in 1899 to a poor, rural family in Cuba. When he was a very young man, he had polio, and it permanently disabled him. So he couldn't work the farm, and so they sent him away to school. In fact, he became the only member of his family that can read. And he would read anything and everything he could.
Now, when I was growing up my grandfather lived with us. And on many days I would sit on the porch of our home and listen to him tell me stories about history, about politics and about baseball, as he puffed one of his three daily cigars.
Now, it's been over 27 years since I've sat on that porch. And so all the details of the things he told me are not as clear as they once were. But there's one thing I vividly remember. It was a powerful sentiment that he wanted to make sure I understood. And that was because -- and that was this: that because of where he was born and who he was born to, there was only so much he was able to accomplish. But he wanted me to know that I would not have those limits, that there was no dreams, no ambitions, no aspirations unavailable to me. And he was right.
See, I was not born to a wealthy or connected family. And yet I have never felt limited by the circumstances of my birth. I have never once felt that there was something I couldn't do because of who my parents were or weren't. Now, why is it that I've been able to accomplish the things that my grandfather could not? Why did my dreams have the chance that his didn't?
The answer is simple. Because I am privileged. I am privileged to be a citizen of the single greatest society in all of human history. There's never been a nation like the United States, ever. It begins with the principles of our founding documents, principles that recognize that our rights come from God, not from our government -- principles that recognize that because all of us are equal in the eyes of our creator, all life is sacred at every stage of life.
Yeah. These principles embody the commitment to individual liberty which has made us the freest people in history. They also made possible our free-enterprise economy, which has made us the most prosperous people in history. The result is an America where -- which is the only place in the world where it doesn't matter who your parents were or where you came from. You can be anything you are willing to work hard to be. The result is the only economy in the world where poor people with a better idea and a strong work ethic can compete and succeed against rich people in the marketplace and competition. And the result is the most reliable defender of freedom in the history of the world.
Simply put, there's nothing like America in all the world. And even today with the problems that we face, who would you rather be? Which country would you trade places with? Just remember, an afterthought, when was the last time that you heard news accounts about a boatload of American refugees arriving on the shores of another country? And yet there have always have been those who haven't seen it this way. There have always been those that don't recognize this. They think that we need a guardian class in American government to protect us from ourselves. They think that the free-enterprise system is unfair, that a few people make a lot of money, and the rest of us get left behind. They believe that the only way business can make its money is by exploiting its workers and its customers. And they think that America's enemies exist because of something America did to earn their enmity.
Now, the problem is that in 2008 leaders with this worldview won elections. And now they know that the American people will never support their vision of America. So, instead, over the last 12 months they have used a severe economic downturn, a severe recession as an excuse to implement the statist policies that they have longed for all this time. In essence, they are using this downturn as cover not to fix America, but to try to change America to fundamentally redefine the role of government in our lives and the role of America in the world.
And let's remember that the expansion of government at home has implications abroad for our country. Now, this growth in our government's being funded by borrowed money. And almost half this money is held in foreign countries. In fact, one of them, China, every time we say something they don't agree with, they remind us of that. The good news is that it didn't take long for the American people to figure all this out.
And now as we near these midterm elections, what the American people are looking for is very clear. They are looking for leaders that understand what has happened, will come up here and stand up against it, and in its place will offer a clear alternative. First, we have to understand what's happening. Leaders at the highest levels of our government are undertaking a deliberate and systematic effort to redefine our government, our economy and our country. Now, people, as I said, all across America figured this out over a year ago, and they didn't wait for their senator or for their congressman to do something about it. They did it themselves. They have taken matters into their own hands, from tea parties to the election in Massachusetts.
From tea parties to the election in Massachusetts, we are witnessing the single greatest political pushback in American history. Now, the political class tries to make sense of all of this, but they can't, because never has the political class or the mainstream media that covers them been more out of touch with the American people than they are today. You see, 2010 is not just a choice between Republicans and Democrats. It's not just a choice between liberals and conservatives. 2010 is a referendum on the very identity of our nation.
And the issues are so big, so consequential, so generational that many of the old rules of political engagement will not apply. For example, a long list of early establishment endorsements will not spare you a primary. Clever one line slogans aren't going to spare you the need to discuss policy issues in detail. And the old, tired political attacks that worked once in the past aren't going to get you elected this time.
And the reason is simple because people get it, because they understand that if we get this wrong, there may be no turning back for America. That's why the second thing leaders want -- the second thing that people want are leaders that will come here to Washington, D.C. and stand up to this big government agenda, not be co-opted by it.
After all, the U.S. Senate already has one Arlen Specter too many. And after all, America already has a Democrat Party, it doesn't need two Democrat parties.
Now, look, it's true, Americans do want leaders that will come to Washington, D.C. and work together to get things done, but that comes with a very important caveat, it depends what they're trying to do. If they're working to lower tax rates, simplify the tax code, they want us to work together. If they're working to get control of a runaway of a federal debt and annual deficits, they want us to work together.
If they're working to defeat radical Islam and the threat that it poses through terrorism, they want us to work together.
However, however, if the goal is to abandon America's free enterprise economy, if the goal is to convert America into a submissive member of the international community, if the goal is not to fix America, but to change America, then they want leaders that are going to come up here and fight it every step of the way.
That cheer -- I don't know what that one was, but that Marco cheer always worries me because I'm always afraid that someone is going to starting screaming, "polo," and would ruin the speech.
Thank you.
Finally, voters are looking for leaders that will offer a clear alternative. You know, this severe economic downturn is a perfect time to embrace and reinvigorate the free enterprise economy, not to abandon it. And look, jobs aren't created by politicians; they're created by people who are willing to use their money to start a business or expand an existing one. And what they're looking for are clear signs from Washington that Washington is serious about pro-growth policies, about controlling spending and about ending the practice of monetizing our budget shortfall.
So here are a few measures that I think will help set change or send that signal. Let's reform the tax code and reduce tax rates across the board.
Let's eliminate double taxation by abolishing the taxes on capital gains, on dividends, on interest. And while we're at it, let's eliminate the one on death, too.
Let's significantly lower the corporate tax rates so that once again it's competitive with the rest of the world.
Let's stop big government energy mandates like cap-and-trade, and instead trust the American innovator to make us energy independent.
Instead of having the federal government go out and open an insurance company, let's make a series of simple changes that puts the consumer in charge of health-care spending in America. And while we're at it, let's try some lawsuit abuse reform, as well. And finally, let's undertake serious measures that show that we are serious about getting control of our federal national debt.
Now, Americans are also looking for clear alternatives on the issues of national defense. As I said earlier, there is no greater risk to this country than the risk posed by radical Islamic terrorists. Let me be clear about something. These terrorists aren't trying to kill us because we offended them. They attack us because they want to impose their view of the world on as many people as they can, and America is standing in their way. We need to make it unmistakably clear that we will do whatever it takes, for however long it takes, to defeat radical Islamic terrorism.
We will punish -- we will punish their allies, like Iran -- and we will stand with our allies, like Israel. We will target and we will destroy terrorist cells and the leaders of those cells. The ones that survive, we will capture them.
AUDIENCE: Marco!
RUBIO: We will get important -- remember the Marco Polo thing I told you? We will capture them, we will get useful information from them and then we will bring them to justice, in front of a military tribunal in Guantanamo -- as I said, in front of a military tribunal in Guantanamo, not a civilian courtroom in Manhattan.
Let me close by saying this. For many of us who were born and raised in this country, including me, it's sometimes easy -- sometimes easy to forget how special America really is. But I was raised by exiles, by people who know what it is like to lose their country, by people who have a unique perspective on why elections matter, or lack thereof, by people who clearly understand how different America is from the rest of the world. And they've taught me this my whole life.
And they taught me, by word and by deed, that what makes America great is not that we have more rich people than anybody else. What makes America great is that there are dreams that are impossible everywhere else but are possible here. And why is that? It's because of the choices that people that came before us made.
Almost every other country in the world chose to have the government run the economy. They chose to allow government to decide which companies survive and fail. They chose to allow government to determine which industries are to be rewarded. But the problem is that when government controls the economy, those who can influence government keep winning, and everybody else just stays the same. And so in those countries, the employee never becomes the employer, the small business can never compete with a big business, and no matter how hard your parents work or how many sacrifices they make, if you weren't born into the right family in those countries, there's only so far you can go.
Now, we've had our excesses here in America, but for the better part of 234 years, Americans have chosen something very different, Americans chose individual liberty instead of the false security of government. Americans chose a limited government that exists to protect our rights, not to grant them.
Americans chose a free enterprise system designed to provide a quality of opportunity, not compel a quality of results. And that is why this is only place in the world where you can open up a business in the spare bedroom of your home.
That is why this is the only place in the world where a company that started as an idea drawn out on the back of a cocktail napkin can one day be publicly traded on Wall Street. That's why this is the only country in the world where today's employee is tomorrow's employer. And yet, there are still people in American politics who, for some reason, cling to this belief that America is better off adopting the economic policies of nations whose people who immigrate here from there.
Now, they have the right to believe whatever they want, but I do not have that option. You see, I'm one generation removed from a very different life. My mother was one of seven sisters born to my grandfather that I talked about earlier born to very humble parents who struggled every day. My father had it even tougher. His mother died when he was only six years old and the day after her funeral, he went to work selling coffee in the streets of Havana with his father and as best as I can tell, he worked from then on for 70 years.
They came to America with virtually nothing, no English, no money, no friends. Only the strong determination to provide their children all the opportunities they never had.
My mom worked as a cashier, a factory worker, a maid and a K-Mart stock clerk; my dad primarily as a bartender. Both of my parents worked jobs so their children could have careers and their lives were never easy.
How many nights did I hear the keys of my 70-year-old father at the door as he came home after another 16-hour day? How many mornings would I wake up and run into my mom who was just coming home from the overnight shift as a stock clerk at K-Mart?
When you're young and in a hurry, the meaning of those moments escape you, but as the years go by and as my own children get older, I understand it now. I realize that my parents were once my age, that they once had dreams -- that there were some things that they once wanted to accomplish. But because of where they were born, because of who they were born to, because they lost their country, their dreams never had a chance. So they came here to America and went to work and it became the mission of their lives to give us the chance to do everything that they could not.
And so now I know that every chance I have ever had and everything that I will ever accomplish, I owe to God, to my parents' sacrifices and to the United States of America.
My parents never achieved wealth or influence, but their hard work opened doors for their children that had been closed for them, and so to me, their story is the very essence of the American miracle. It is a story that is rare in the world, and yet, it is common here. It is common here because those that came before us chose to live in a free society. It is common here because those who came before us chose free enterprise. But now our leaders are asking us to choose something very different. They're asking us to abandon the things that separate us from the rest of the world.
Those that came before us made their choice and now, you and I must make ours.
Now, I must decide, do I want my children to grow up in the country that I grew up in or do I want them to grow up in a country like the one my parents grew up in?
Now you must decide. Do you want your children to inherit your hopes and your dreams?
AUDIENCE: Yes!
RUBIO: Or do you want them to inherit your unfulfilled and unresolved problems?
AUDIENCE: No!
RUBIO: And so now we must decide. Do we want to continue to be exceptional, or are we prepared to become like everybody else?
AUDIENCE MEMBER: No.
RUBIO: It's a clear choice between two very different futures. And the task this year for us is to make sure that Americans choose the right one. You see -- my four children, your children and grandchildren are members of the most important generation in American history. If we succeed in convincing the American people to follow up, theirs will be the most prosperous generation in the history of our country. But if we fail, they will be the first to inherit a diminished nation.
The final verdict on our generation will be written by Americans who haven't even been born yet. Let us make sure they write that we made the right choice, that in the early years of this century, faced with troubling and uncertain times, there were those who believed that the great American story had run its course. But we did not agree. Fear did not lead us to abandon our liberty. Uncertainty did not lead us to abandon the entrepreneurial spirit. We fought for and held on to those things that made us exceptional. And because we did, there was still one place in the world where the individual was more important than the state. Because we did, there was still at least one place in the world where who you come from does not determine where you get to go.
Let us ensure that history's record of this time is clear that like those Americans that came before us, we rose to face the challenges of our time. Like those Americans who came before us, we made the right choice. And because we did, at least for one generation more the American miracle lived on.
Thank you all. And God bless you. Thank you for having me.


Linked by The Millstone Diaries - Thank you!

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Telegraphs Most Influential Conservatives In the Time of Obama

The Telegraph UK is releasing their list of the 100 most influential Conservatives, and the 100 most influential Liberals, while Barack Obama sat in the Oval Office - In the Time of Obama. The lists will be revealed, a few at a time, over the next few days, with the top 20 coming out on January 15th.

The Telegraphs says they view those chosen as "identifiably" conservative, although not "always self-described" as such (dittos Liberals).

These are not lists that rank ideological purity – the number one liberal will not necessarily be any more liberal than number 100 – but they will inevitably discriminate against centrists, technocrats, independents and fence-sitters.
The first Telegraph List covered 2007-2008. If the Conservative was on the previous list, I've put the ranking in parentheses.

The list of Top Conservatives revealed today covers Nos. 61 through 100. I've listed a few that interest me. See the Telegraph article.

Dang! Mark Sanford comes in at No. 100 (91).

Some commentary here - if Mark Sanford is still on this list, what a waste of space. How about Senator Jim Inhofe, who has been a true thorn in the side of Liberals and has thwarted many of their plans, mainly by speaking clearly to the press every opportunity he has. He should at the least be below the 50 mark. Of course, maybe he is. That list has not yet been released.

96) Liz Cheney (Liz is greatly underestimated at No. 96, in my opinion)
93) Charlie Crist, Governor of Florida and candidate for U.S. Senate
92) Clifford May
89) Fred Thompson
88) Patrick Ruffini - Political Strategist
87) Eric Odom - Tea Party organizer
85) Bill O'Reilly
84) Thomas Sowell
83) Lindsay Graham
82) (55) Jack Keane U.S. Army General
81) Marco Rubio - running against No. 93 - Charlie Crist for US Senate Florida
80) Michelle Bachmann - Congresswoman for Minnesota
79) Lou Dobbs

77) Joe Wilson - Congressman from S.C. - that's what speaking about Obama will do for ya' - get you on the right list!

76) (86) Jeb Bush
75) (26) James Dobson
74) (84) Ann Coulter
72) Tucker Carlson (who knew?)
70) (87) Michael Barone
69) Olympia Snowe - Senator from Maine. Dang!
67) Joe Scarborough (hardly conservative enough to be tagged a conservative)
66) (58) Victor Davis Hanson
65) (69) Erick Erickson from RedState.com
64) Chris Ruddy - founder and CEO of Newsmax.com
63) Jim DeMint - Senator South Carolina
63) (17) Frank Luntz



Some notes of interest: In the Telegraph's list of the most influential conservatives in 2007, which was published in October '07, Rudy Giuliani was No. 1, General Petraeus No. 2, Matt Drudge No. 3, Newt Gingrich No. 4, Rush Limbaugh No. 5, Dick Cheney No. 6, Robert Gates No. 7, Chief Justice John Roberts No. 8, John McCain No. 9 and Mitt Romney No. 10.





Thursday, November 5, 2009

Newt Gingrich Sean Hannity on Scozzafava: Videos Newt Gingrich Marco Rubio

Sean Hannity gives Newt Gingrich an opportunity for redemption. After Sean explains that Newt was his first interview, ever, in Atlanta, establishing that the two go way, way back, the discussion of Scozzafava and the NY23rd began.



Newt Gingrich


Hannity began "I was surprised that you had endorsed her [Scozzafava]." Newt has a few weasel words, but did say he regretted that his endorsement. Don't we know he does. He pointed out that he endorsed Hoffman and worked hard for him (yes, Sunday, Monday and election day - far too little, way too late).

We will know that Newt's political heart has really changed when he endorses Marco Rubio for governor in Florida. Thanks to Saint Petersblog for the following transcript of an interview with Newt about Crist and Rubio:
Reporter: Speaker, why don't you tell us who do you like for the Florida Senate race?

Newt: Well, I think they're both fine people.

I've worked with Governor Crist for many years, and I've worked with Speaker Marco Rubio. It's going to be an interesting choice. Marco Rubio's a very aggressive, very articulate conservative. Governor Crist is a very solid political figure.

I think that Florida's very fortunate to have that kind of a primary. Those are both very good people.
We know what a "very solid political figure" means. It means Crist has a lot of name recognition and is a polished politician. Crist is not conservative. Marco Rubio is conservative. We'll see what happens as the primary nears, but the GOP has already endorsed Charlie Crist. A pox on them!

The first video below is the Newt and Hannity discussion about Scozzafava. The second video is Newt in Florida at a book signing and an interview with a local reporter, when he is asked about Marco Rubio and sitting governor, Charlie Crist.






Newt Gingrich - Sean Hannity on DeDe Scozzafava










Newt Gingrich - Marco Rubio and Charlie Crist

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Newt Gingrich Backs Doug Hoffman: Gingrich Age of Party Leaders Picking People is Over

Newt Gingrich is backing Doug Hoffman. What a difference a day, a Sarah Palin endorsement, and a few tea parties make. The age of party leaders picking people is over. See update 11-3-09 below. Also see post election update below:




Newt Gingrich


This from Newt is a brave statement:
The age of party leaders picking people is over.
However, he goes on to  call Dede Scozzafava a "statesman:"
 Scozzafava did the statesmanlike thing in dropping out.
And he says the populist movement wins over politics-as-usual:
This is both a tribute to the power of the national conservative movement to define an issue and a commentary on the populist anger against politics-as-usual.
Gingrich admits that he has been a part of "politics-as-usual." Isn't that pitiful? Sarah Palin brought DeDe Scozzafava to national attention. I doubt many of us would have known about her without Palin's endorsement of Hoffman. Sarah is no longer an elected official. She is now one of the conservative sentries sprinkled around the country - standing guard, as are our the tea parties. We are back on track.

In an interview with Rush Limbaugh in January 2008, Gingrich said this:
We are at the end of the Reagan era. We're at a point in time when we're about to start redefining -- as a number of people started talking about, starting to redefine -- the nature of the Republican Party, in response to what the country needs.

Wrong!

Newt, the great modern day, post-Reagan brain of conservative politics, has forgotten that Ronald Reagan did the hard lifting. Reagan didn't "redefine," he didn't figure it out for himself, he just took the Constitution's conservative principles and planted both feet squarely. When he could not get the policy he wanted, he didn't stop talking about conservatism. He didn't start making excuses, redefining and looking around for a bigger tent.

Newt fell into the trap. He forgot that conservative populism is constitutional populism. He forgot that populism is "we the people." He knew it when he was Speaker. Conservative principles haven't changed. As Newt once said, the primary purpose of a political leader is to:
"build a majority. If [voters] care about parking lots, then talk about parking lots."
So let's get on with it and talk about conservatism. If we can fill a big tent with pro-choicers joining us because conservatism, in the main, is a constitutional and very decent position, then let them enter. Let us talk, and talk, and talk about what is constitutional and what is not.

Newt gets it: The age of the party picking people is over. It should have never started. "We the people" allowed it to happen. We thought our chosen leaders would be on watch, but that sentry failed. Even as we began to wake up, the leadership didn't listen. We'll keep our sentry posted. Now let's work on getting support for Marco Rubio in Florida who is the only conservative in the race for the U.S. Senate.

Update 11-3-09:
Gingrich has told the AP that he is "deeply upset" that Scozzafave endorsed the Democrat, David Owens in the NY23 congressional race. He asked:
How could she have accepted all that support?" he said, adding later: "I'm very, very let down because she told everybody she was a Republican, and she said she was a loyal Republican."
Earth to Newt: did you ever take just a minute to check out her voting background or her associations? All the info was very public and very available. Hoffman was in the area telling everyone, everything about her. How did Sarah figure it out and you didn't?

Post election update - my message to Newt Gingrich and party leaders:
Doug Hoffman Loses NY23: Conservatives Win Battle of Principle

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Charlie Crist Marco Rubio: Marco Rubio is Charlie Crist Challenger

Marco Rubio is challenging Charlie Crist for a Republican seat from Florida in the U.S. Senate. Crist is the sitting governor of Florida. Rubio is a former speaker in the Florida House of Representatives. The GOP endorsed Governor Crist months ago, although Crist has had an embarassing love affair with Barack Obama and his administration. See video below.



Marco Rubio

The Miami Herald reported this week that Rubio has cut Crist's lead in the Senate race by half. That's encouraging news because Marco Rubio is actually a conservative Republican. 
Crist, who surpassed Rubio by 29 points in an August survey, now leads 50-35 percent in the Republican contest for Florida's open Senate seat, according to a Quinnipiac University survey of 1,078 Florida voters released Wednesday.
``The fact that Crist has fallen below 50 percent in a primary against a lesser known opponent suggests potential vulnerability,'' concluded the Rasmussen poll.
Since Quinnipiac's last poll in August, Crist has fallen 5 percentage points and Rubio has gained 9 percentage points.
Another encouraging sign for Rubio: Forty-four percent of Republicans view him favorably, compared with only 3 percent who have an unfavorable view...Brown says Rubio's numbers are ``phenomenal'' since only Republicans can vote in the primary.

About 63 percent of Republicans view Crist favorably, and 30 percent have an unfavorable view. But only 5 percent of Republicans say they haven't heard enough about Crist, while 64 percent say they haven't heard enough about Rubio.
While the GOP stubbornly funds Crist, Rubio is reminding Republicans of Crist's appearance with Barack Obama, and worse, his enthusiastic support of the $787 billion federal stimulus package, and a committed support of climate-change legislation.
Rubio has gained ground by combining social-networking tools -- like Facebook and Twitter -- with old-fashioned retail politics, trekking to Republican clubs and civic groups throughout the state to make his case. He's picked up his fundraising pace, earned glowing praise in conservative media, and bested Crist in roughly a dozen nonbinding straw polls at local Republican club meetings from Monroe to Hillsborough counties.
 Hero Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) endorsed Marco Rubio:
I enthusiastically support Marco Rubio in his campaign for U.S. Senate. Marco is exactly the type of conservative leader Americans need in Washington today fighting for the principles of limited government, individual liberty and personal responsibility.
“Like me, Marco believes that the federal government works best when it returns dollars, decisions and freedom to our local communities and families. In the Senate, Marco will stand up for America’s taxpayers, not with President Obama and dangerous big government spending,” he added.
 Dr. Richard Swier, writing for Red County, calls Crist a "cap and trader," and an "Enviro-Statist," and says the State of Florida will "pay a dear price in jobs, taxes and increased [energy costs] if Cap and Trade passes into law.

In May 2009, The Mike Thomas Blog said that much of Rubio's success in this Senate race depends on Jeb Bush's support.
Bush has no love for Crist, and has preached against the evils of Republicans turning to a ‘Democrat Lite’’ strategy to get elected. Crist is the poster child for Democratic Lite. In fact, I’m hard pressed to find much positive Bush has said about Crist since Crist was elected.
A former Republican governor turning against a sitting governor would be a surprise and, probably a shock, but it should not be. We need some honest backing of conservatives. Contrary to business as usual, the good ole boy networking must end.

Also in May of last year, there was a flurry of interest when Jeb Bush did endorse Marco Rubio, but that Jeb Bus is the son of former governor Jeb Bush.

Thomas puts it this way:
One might argue that if Bush feels strongly enough about the direction of the party, he should put some skin in the game and publicly back Rubio. That would open a lot of donor doors and redefine Rubio’s chances from none to slim. If Rubio showed a spark of life here, it actually could open up a floodgate of disgruntled conservatives, unhappy with Crist’s direction.
The National Review Online interviewed Marco Rubio this past summer and said Rubio considers Jeb Bush The Governor his mentor. NRO quotes Bush criticizing the Republican Senatorial committee for endorsing Crist at such an early date:
“I think [Rubio] should be given a chance. I think that the idea that the national party would pick a winner a year and a half before an election is the wrong way to go.”
Marco Rubio is 38-years-old. He was born in Miamia, FL, lived in Las Vegas, NV for about 6 years from the age of 8. He attended South Miami Senior High School and graduated in 1989. He graduated University of Florida with a B.S and received his J.D. Cum Laude from the University of Miami in 1996. He and his wife, Jeanette have 4 children.










Marco Rubio is Charlie Crist Challenger (video)

Sunday, September 27, 2009

George LeMieux is Florida Senator: George LeMieux Replaces Mel Martinez

Florida politics are interesting, to say the least. Senator Mel Martinez (R-FL) announced he would be retiring early from the U.S. Senate. Governor Charlie Crist (R-FL) announced he will not run for Governor next time around; rather he wants to be Florida's next Senator.

George LeMieux
 
With Martinez' departure, Crist was forced to name a replacement for the Martinez senate seat. Who do you name to the senate seat that you want to fill just one year from now. Obviously you name someone you can trust, someone you know will not be tempted to continue attending the senate. In this case, Crist appointed attorney, best friend and former Crist Chief of Staff and 2006-Crist campaign manager, George LeMieux, who has recently been in private law practice. LeMieux resigned chairmanship of the firm of Gunster Yoakley & Stewart to take the senate seat. Here's the Florida Democrat Party official reaction:
Today, Charlie Crist decided to play political games with the public's trust by appointing George LeMiuex to the U.S. Senate. This glaring example of political cronyism is the last thing Florida needed while we face these tough economic times and the Congress is tackling critical issues such as health insurance reform and global warming.
He, he, he! Love it, love it, love it! Putting on my serious face, can Charlie Crist actually appoint a Republican to a senate seat? Yes he can. Bet you thought only Democrats can get an appointment (just kidding - it seems these days, there is no way for a Republican to win a seat - until...maybe 2010).

Democrat Governor Deval Patrick of Massachusetts just appointed Paul G. Kirk to take Ted Kennedy's seat. Kirk has never held elective office, but in the Boston-way, the Kennedy-way, he is considered "a quiet fixer," and a "trusted adviser of the Kennedy clan."

According to this story, although Kirk has never served as a public official, he is considered "comfortable working in the shadows...a savvy, adroit deal maker who has grappled with some of the most emotional rifts in Democratic party politics." Hmmmm.

It pains me to see to a seat-holder for Charlie Crist, however. The RNC is backing Crist, but as we know, Crist is no conservative. The man even attended a Florida Townhall with Obama in February to support the President's stimulus. How disgusting is that?  

Crist is seen as the "sure thing" for the Martinez seat, after Democrats had visions of putting their own into the august body when Martinez left. The vision didn't include Crist's decision to leave the Governor's office, so now Democrats are sullen. I want a Republican in the senate from the state of Florida, but I want Marco Rubio, not Charlie Crist. I'm not a Florida voter (I don't have a beach house, so can't vote as so many Florida snowbirds are said to do). I have no say, but I believe Charlie Crist has the potential to be another Arlen Specter at worst, and at best another Olympia Snow. He is milk-toast. Rubio is a strong contender, but he doesn't have the RNC behind him. It's a shame because Marco Rubio, a former Florida State House Speaker could be a great, conservative senator holding to small government and lower taxes:
A fluently bilingual 37-year-old Cuban-American evangelical from a blue-collar immigrant background with an ex-cheerleader wife, four children, a deep belief in the healing power of tax cuts, and square-jawed all-American looks, Rubio is a caricature of the ideal 21st-century Republican. With possible behind-the-scenes support from Jeb Bush, Rubio is planning a scorched-earth campaign against Crist as a firebrand conservative standing against the forces of big-government RINOism.
My bet is that Jeb Bush will not support Rubio - just a guess, but the very conservative senate hero, Senator Jim DeMint, IS already endorsing Rubio. The danger, of course, is that Florida splits the vote and sends a Democrat to Washington, D.C. This coming race causes me a lot of angst. I don't like RINO's. I don't want a RINO in the Senate. I hope Floridians vote their values and their principles and try to send Marco Rubio to the Capitol. If the Democrat contender wins, so be it. There are far worse things than trying to do the right thing.

The video below is Mr. Rubio speaking with Laura Ingraham just a few days ago.

 
Marco Rubio - Can he win George LeMieux' Seat?
 
Read a Marco Rubio biography here.

More on Paul Kirk at Blog@MoreWhat. It is striking what WE DO NOT KNOW about our government officials. Please read this blog and click the orange text to read the rest of the story of Obama government corruption.

©2007-2012copyrightMaggie M. Thornton